Showing posts with label Barclays Capital. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Barclays Capital. Show all posts

16 June 2015

CESC Ltd. Bottoming out: Initiate at OW -Barclays Capital

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share

�� India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details ��

21 December 2014

Six Indian companies in Barclays top global 133 stocks for 2015

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share

The six Indian companies, including 

  1. Reliance Industries, 
  2. Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), 
  3. Bharti Airtel, 
  4. HDFC Bank, 
  5. Lupin and 
  6. Voltas, 

are listed in the investment major's 'Global Top Picks' which presents 133 stocks, reflecting top companies from across the globe.

�� India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details ��

07 October 2013

Barclays Capital -European Economics Quarterly

07 August 2013

INR: Stability at any cost? • Barclays Capital

INR: Stability at any cost?
• Economics: Policymakers in India want to stabilise the INR. We evaluate a set of
potential options that policymakers could consider. Such measures, in our view,
include direct intervention in foreign exchange markets by the RBI, further
tightening of liquidity, and issuance of INR global bonds or FX-denominated
deposits for nonresident Indians.
• The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has already acted aggressively, tightening liquidity
and hiking the upper end of the policy rate corridor, in an attempt to stem ongoing
INR weakening. The RBI's surprise tightening has been stark, but similar to that in
early-1998, soon after the Asian crisis.
• It seems that the RBI expects its actions to meaningfully reduce speculative
pressures on the INR. We, however, feel that the current steps will be relatively
ineffective to support the INR, if not counterproductive, unless followed quickly by
other policy initiatives. However, different measures will have different effects on
different asset classes in fixed income markets.
• FX: Recent measures by the RBI and policy uncertainties have increased upside risks
to our near-term USD/INR forecasts. For the medium term, we still expect INR
appreciation against USD, given that the INR is significantly cheap relative to history
and to its peers. We still expect USD/INR at 59 in 1 month, and 56 in 12 months,
• Rates: Even though a liquidity squeeze may stem INR weakness, the collateral
damage is to foreign bond flows, which the government has been cultivating for
many months. We think INR stability this week has more to do with external factors
than the adopted measures, giving markets a false sense of security. We expect a
long period of uncertainty. Should the external environment become supportive,
yields will grind lower, but will factor in a sizeable risk premium. Finally, available
policy options eliminate the tail risk.
• Credit: At current levels, bonds of Indian issuers are fairly priced. If they lag the
market by 15-20bp, we would recommend buying into the complex. Most courses of
policy action to stabilise the INR should have a positive spillover effects in the credit
market. From a curve perspective, the 2016s and 2017s offer attractive carry and
rolldown.

22 July 2013

INR and RBI –History repeating itself? Barclays Capital,

INR and RBI –History repeating itself?
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) delivered a surprise 200bp hike in the Marginal
Standing Facility (MSF) earlier this week, along with capping banks’ repo borrowing to
INR750bn and the announcement of the absorption of market liquidity through the
open market sale of government securities. The RBI’s moves were targeted to push
short-term interest rates sharply higher, thereby, making forex speculation costlier. A
similar strategy was adopted by the RBI in January 1998, immediately after the South
East Asian currency crisis in November 1997, to combat heightened forex market
volatility. We spot a few key comparisons between the RBI’s current moves vis-à-vis
those in early 1998.
Tightening in 1998 –Adeparture from the RBI’s stated easing bias
First, the RBI had been easing in the recent months despite their cautious rhetoric (75bp
repo rate cuts from January to April2013). The current hike can, thus, be seen as a departure
from the course of RBI action, albeit possibly on a temporary basis/in the near term.
Similarly, during late 1997, the central bank had clearly started monetary policy easing to
revitalise growth following a phase of high inflation, heavy monetary tightening and a slump
in growth during the mid-1990s. In fact, in October 1997, the RBI had explicitly guided for
the lowering of the cash reserve ratio (CRR) cumulatively in stages, to 8% from 10%, on
eight specified dates between October 1997 and March 1998. Thus, on both occasions,
while the domestic macroeconomic considerations prompted the RBI to remain growth
supportive, the meaningful deterioration in the macroeconomic backdrop got triggered
from external developments (the Asian crisis in late 1997 and the current possibility of QE
tapering), whichled to a quick switch in policy priorities of the central bank.
Tightening in 1998 was multi-layered, fast and furious
Second, the quantum of hikes in policy interest rates and/or in reserve requirement
(CRR) had been stark on both occasions. Similar to the hike in the MSF rate earlier this
week, the bank rate was hiked by 200bp on 16 January 1998 (to 11% from 9%).
Additionally, CRR was hiked by 50bp to 10.5% and the repo rate was raised by 200bp to
9% at the same time. Currently also, the measures relating to restricting banks’ repo
borrowing quantum and the announcement of the sale of government securities
through open market operations (OMO) highlight the focus on tightening liquidity by
the RBIto make hikes in policy interest rates more effective.
Third, bank rate –which was the key policy interest rate in the late-1990s –was hiked in
January 1998. Hiking the key policy interest rate was not the first step from the central
bank. Prior to that, the RBI had hiked the repo rate (which was an additional policy
interest rate during that time) sharply from 4.5% to 7% in three stages within a span of
less than 10 days (3-11 December 1997). It was, in fact, hiked again by another 200bp
to 9% on 16 January 1998. In the current phase, the RBI has so far not hiked the repo
rate – which is the key policy interest rate in the RBI’s current monetary policy
framework. It is important to note that we do not expect any hike in the repo rate in the
current round. Such a move would not necessarily enhance the probability of effectively
curbing pressures on the INR, in our view, since it could further dent FII flows into India

28 June 2013

Tata Steel Management meeting takeaways : Barclays Capital,

Tata Steel
Management meeting takeaways
We met the management of Tata Steel. We sense an increasing willingness by the
company to look at strategic opportunities to raise cash flow and reduce leverage.
That said, we are concerned that: 1) capex needs will remain elevated until FY15E; and
2) we expect product mix to deteriorate further in the near term. While we don’t
doubt the viability of incremental capex, we remain concerned that weak operating
cash flows coupled with firm capex will lead to a further increase in gearing.
Focus on consolidation: Balance sheet consolidation appears to be increasingly a focus
area for the group. That said, we remain sceptical that the European asset sale will go
through smoothly (refer our report dated 11 April, European Assets on the block?). We
think sale of equity holdings (US$1.2bn) and non-core assets is more likely to continue.
We also sensed a need for geographical consolidation in the group. Management said
that the group would be more focused on India and believes that the investment in its
Odisha project is strategically important in terms of long-term business mix, balance
sheet de-risking and maintaining market share in India.
Capex to remain firm: The total capex requirement for Odisha phase I (3mt) has
increased to Rs240bn (vs. Rs190bn earlier) with an Rs80bn outlay p.a. over FY14-FY15.
There is no decision yet on the Orissa phase II project (another 3mt) timelines and
implementation. Tata Steel intends to spend US$500m p.a. in Europe on performance
improvement. There is no large capex planned in the overseas mining subsidiaries.
Product mix to deteriorate further: We have been highlighting that Tata Steel’s
product mix is moving more towards commodity grade HRC with a declining
contribution to the high-margin auto segment. We expect the mix to deteriorate further
in FY14E before improving after the commissioning of the CR mill in Q4FY14E.
Gearing to increase; covenants comfortable: We expect net debt to increase further over
FY15E (to US$12bn). We think debt covenants both in India and in subsidiaries remain
comfortable even after considering recent asset impairments/goodwill write-down.

28 May 2013

Double-edged foreign flows: Barclays


• Foreign investment is likely to flow into countries with high historical returns on
capital. Balance of payments data can help to identify countries with particularly
high returns on foreign investments in bonds and equities, and on foreign direct
investment. We find returns on foreign investments have been high in Malaysia,
the Philippines, Thailand and Indonesia, which bodes well for future inflows.
Returns have been low in Korea and Taiwan, and average in Singapore and India.
• The flip side of large foreign investment flows in the past and high returns on
foreign capital is deterioration of the current account balance (via increasing
income outflows). Indonesia and Thailand stand out on this measure.
• Moreover, even countries with a large amount of foreign assets – often in the
form of foreign exchange reserves, which earn low yields – regularly experience
a negative impact. Countries with high levels of reserves such as China, Thailand,
the Philippines and Malaysia should benefit from reserve diversification, which
could add to intra-regional bond demand
• Indonesia and India would benefit most from structural reforms targeting their
current account deficits. Otherwise, given their large funding needs and low
reserve coverage ratios, they are likely to continue to suffer large losses on their
external positions.

12 May 2013

India Gold and oil prices – Major silver linings? :: Barclays Capital


India
Gold and oil prices – Major silver linings?
The drop in commodity prices, particularly in gold and crude oil, if sustained, could be
a major positive driver for India. The immediate and most visible impact would be on
the current account balance, which could improve by nearly 1% of GDP in FY 13-14, on
our estimates. A reduction in oil under-recoveries would also reduce the necessity for
domestic fuel price hikes, which contribute over 25% to current inflation.
Crude oil and gold are the two major commodity imports for India, and both have increased
significantly in recent years. India’s oil imports are typically sticky and not very sensitive to
price. The surge in gold import demand in recent years, on the other hand, has remained
mostly speculative in nature. This means that in the case of a downward trending price, not
only would the gold import bill likely decline, volumes could also decrease.
We examined the potential change in India’s net import bill in light of the recent drop in
prices of these two commodities, under the assumption that there will be no change in
oil/gold import volumes due to price change. Given the observed price-demand
relationship in recent years, we believe this is a conservative assumption.
We estimate that if gold prices remain flat at USD1400/oz, and Brent crude remains at
USD100/bl, India’s net import bill for these commodities could fall by nearly USD7bn and
over USD13bn, respectively, given our flat volume assumptions. This would result in net
savings of around USD20bn on the current account deficit, lowering it to USD66bn
(around 3.2% of GDP) and bringing it below our baseline estimate of over USD85bn
(4.1% of GDP). We have also not factored in any drop in other metal prices, such as
copper/palladium/silver, which could increase the benefits to the current account.

24 July 2012

Jaiprakash Power -Strong operating performance in 1Q FY13, , Barclays Capital,



JAIPRAKASH POWER VENTURES LTD.
Strong operating performance in 1Q FY13
1Q FY13 pretax profit was up 135% and marginally ahead of our estimates. The PAT
beat was though higher, led by lower taxes in this quarter. Revenue growth of 98%
y/y was driven by contribution from complete commissioning of Karcham Wangtoo.
Management highlighted that generation would have been higher than reported
numbers by 30% had the monsoons been on track. Karcham Wangtoo (1GW)
generated ~1.3bn units in June quarter and will continue to sell power at merchant
rates till the PPA dispute with PTC is resolved. We maintain our 1-OW rating.


24 June 2012

HDFC BANK (HDFCB IN, 1-OW, PT RS590): STEADY PERFORMANCE ::Barclays Capital,



HDFC BANK (HDFCB IN, 1-OW, PT RS590): STEADY PERFORMANCE
HDFC Bank remains our top pick in the private sector banks space. Its strong liability
franchise, relatively conservative provisioning policies, and track record of consistent
delivery justifiably position it as a low-risk investment. Its strong pre-provision
profitability provides it a strong loss-absorbing cushion in the current environment. We
raise our price target to Rs590 from Rs539 as we roll forward the stock’s valuation on
22x one-year forward earnings. The key risk to our call is a slowdown in the bank’s
growth.


INDIA BANKS It’s a U- not a V- shaped recovery ::Barclays Capital




INDIA BANKS
It’s a U- not a V- shaped recovery
We maintain our view that FY13 will be another tough year for the banking sector.
The macro environment is likely to remain difficult, particularly in contrast to the
sharp recovery of FY10. Credit quality trends are unlikely to improve sharply as
industrial production is particularly weak, corporate leverage is high and the power
sector is likely to require restructuring. Growth is likely to remain moderate as
investment activity remains sluggish and an inflation-fighting RBI restrains
monetary growth. On the revenue front, we expect fee growth to remain moderate
and we see some downside risk to NIMs. We have 1-OW ratings on SBI, HDFC and
IDFC and 3-UW ratings on Yes Bank and Bank of Baroda.