| Yes Bank (YES IN) Q414 results: lower PPOP growth, asset quality improved | Underweight Price: Rs441.35 23 Apr 2014 Price Target: Rs360.00 PT End Date: 31 Mar 2015 | |
Yes Bank reported PAT of Rs 4.3bn (up 19% y/y, 9%> JPMe), mainly on account of lower provisions. PPOP growth remained subdued due to higher opex. Asset quality improved despite weak macro. Margins expanded by ~10bp, driven by lower funding costs. We maintain our UW on the stock as the cheap absolute valuations aren’t that attractive in the context of slowing earnings.
Table 1: Q414 result table
Yes bank
|
4Q13
|
3Q14
|
4Q14
|
YoY
|
QoQ
|
NII
|
6,381
|
6,655
|
7,196
|
12.8%
|
8.1%
|
Other inc
|
3,794
|
3,879
|
4,455
|
17.4%
|
14.9%
|
Opex
|
3,836
|
4,387
|
4,847
|
26.3%
|
10.5%
|
PPOP
|
6,339
|
6,147
|
6,804
|
7.3%
|
10.7%
|
Provisions
|
975
|
133
|
723
|
-25.9%
|
443.9%
|
PBT
|
5,364
|
6,014
|
6,082
|
13.4%
|
1.1%
|
Tax
|
1,742
|
1,858
|
1,779
|
2.1%
|
-4.2%
|
PAT
|
3,622
|
4,156
|
4,302
|
18.8%
|
3.5%
|
NIM
|
3.0%
|
2.9%
|
3.0%
|
0.0%
|
0.1%
|
Cost-Income
|
37.7%
|
41.6%
|
41.6%
|
3.9%
|
0.0%
|
Provisions/PPOP
|
15.4%
|
2.2%
|
10.6%
|
-4.8%
|
8.5%
|
Tax rate
|
32.5%
|
30.9%
|
29.3%
|
-3.2%
|
-1.6%
|
Balance sheet data
| |||||
Loans
|
469,996
|
502,929
|
556,330
|
18.4%
|
10.6%
|
Customer assets
|
603,563
|
637,842
|
696,397
|
15.4%
|
9.2%
|
Deposits
|
669,556
|
680,599
|
741,920
|
10.8%
|
9.0%
|
Credit to Deposit
|
70.2%
|
73.9%
|
75.0%
|
4.8%
|
1.1%
|
CASA Ratio
|
18.9%
|
20.9%
|
22.0%
|
3.1%
|
1.1%
|
Asset Quality
| |||||
Gross NPA
|
943
|
1,958
|
1,749
|
85.5%
|
-10.7%
|
Net NPA
|
70
|
423
|
261
|
273.0%
|
-38.4%
|
Gross NPA (%)
|
0.20%
|
0.39%
|
0.31%
|
0.11%
|
-0.08%
|
Net NPA(%)
|
0.01%
|
0.08%
|
0.05%
|
0.04%
|
-0.03%
|
Credit cost
|
0.86%
|
0.58%
|
0.00%
|
-0.86%
|
-0.58%
|
Total Fee income
|
3,793
|
3,878
|
4,455
|
17.5%
|
14.9%
|
Financial markets
|
716
|
705
|
540
|
-24.6%
|
-23.4%
|
Financial advisory
|
1,656
|
1,630
|
1,762
|
6.4%
|
8.1%
|
Transactional banking
|
931
|
1,101
|
1,338
|
43.7%
|
21.5%
|
3rd party and retail fees
|
490
|
442
|
815
|
66.3%
|
84.4%
|
Capital
| |||||
Tier 1
|
9.5%
|
9.9%
|
9.8%
|
0.3%
|
-0.1%
|
Tier 2
|
8.8%
|
6.2%
|
4.6%
|
-4.2%
|
-1.6%
|
CAR
|
18.3%
|
16.1%
|
14.4%
|
-3.9%
|
-1.7%
|
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
· Asset quality. Gross and Net NPL declined in absolute as well as % terms. Slippages during Q4 were lower at 0.4% v/s 1.2% in the previous quarter. Management clarified that slippages during the quarter were granular in nature whereas in the previous quarter it were concentrated in the mid corporate segment. We expect asset quality to remain under pressure given the weak macro and no visibility of any turnaround in the medium term. We expect credit costs of 90bp in FY15E.
· PPOP growth. PPOP growth remained subdued as opex growth was substantially higher at 26% y/y and 11% q/q whereas revenue growth was lower at 15% y/y. C/Income ratio has been steadily inching upwards (41.6% in Q414 v/s 37.7% in Q413). We expect PPOP growth to be lower in FY15E as the weak macro will result in lower growth opportunities for its high yielding wholesale book whereas building a retail franchise will result in higher costs for the bank.
· Margins. Margins improved by ~10bp in Q4 as funding costs declined by ~17bp. This was however offset by lower yields which were down ~13bp due to higher growth in low yielding retail loans. CASA ratio improved by 110bp q/q and stood at 22% in Q4. The momentum in SA balances continued which was up 55% y/y and 22% q/q. CA balances growth remained subdued at 5% y/y and 6% q/q.
Table 2: Dupont table
1Q13
|
2Q13
|
3Q13
|
4Q13
|
1Q14
|
2Q14
|
3Q14
|
4Q14
| |
NIM
|
2.4%
|
2.6%
|
2.7%
|
2.8%
|
2.6%
|
2.7%
|
2.6%
|
2.7%
|
Fees/Assets
|
1.5%
|
1.4%
|
1.5%
|
1.7%
|
1.8%
|
1.8%
|
1.5%
|
1.7%
|
Operating Expense/Assets
|
-1.6%
|
-1.5%
|
-1.6%
|
-1.7%
|
-1.7%
|
-1.6%
|
-1.7%
|
-1.8%
|
Provisions/Assets
|
-0.2%
|
-0.2%
|
-0.3%
|
-0.4%
|
-0.4%
|
-0.7%
|
-0.1%
|
-0.3%
|
ROA
|
1.5%
|
1.5%
|
1.6%
|
1.6%
|
1.6%
|
1.5%
|
1.6%
|
1.6%
|
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
Figure 1: Margins improved due to lower funding costs
Source: Company data.
Figure 2: Strong growth in SA balances led to improvement in CASA ratio
Source: Company data.
Figure 3: Savings growth remained strong
Source: Company data.
Figure 4: Growth momentum is slowing due to weak macro
Source: Company data.
Investment Thesis
We are UW on the stock as:
1. We do not expect any meaningful recovery in macro, hence asset quality is likely to remain under pressure in the medium term.This would translate into higher credit costs for the bank.
2. In the current high-rate environment, margins are likely to remain under pressure given that the bank is wholesale funded.
3. Capex cycle is likely to remain subdued given worsening macro; hence loan growth is likely to remain modest & also higher rates will result in stagnant corporate bond book.
Valuation
Our Mar-15 PT of Rs360 is based on a Gordon growth model with a normalized ROE of 17.5% and terminal growth of 5%.
Risks to Rating and Price Target
1) Loan growth could be higher than our expectations, with improving macro; 2) If the interest rate cycle turns quickly then margins could improve significantly for the bank, much higher than our expectations.
--
No comments:
Post a Comment