13 May 2012

Continuation of trend and trendline :: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Reliance Industries: The fifth year and counting… ::CLSA

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


The fifth year and counting…
After its recent 15% correction, 2012 is now Reliance’s fifth straight year of
relative under-performance. We foresee some triggers emerging by year-end but
singular variables, such as a gas price hike or the telecom foray, may not be
enough for a sustained re-rating. Reliance needs to create a deep portfolio of
projects to rekindle investor interest. Further, these may need to be in the energy
chain; its ~US$8.5bn non-core portfolio has been a drag on performance. Reliance
has been more reticent here than we had expected clouding its long term outlook.
Reliance has now been under-performing for five years
After its 15% correction since mid-Feb, Reliance’s stock is now under-performing the
Sensex in 2012 – the fifth year in succession. Over this time, FY09-14 earnings have
been cut 18-44%. This is continuing; we recently cut FY12-14 EPS by 2-7% to factor in
lower KG-D6 volumes and SOTP by Rs25/sh to factor in a 30% cut in D1-D3 reserves
to 7tcf. Our current FY13 estimate (~Rs69/sh, similar to consensus) implies a ~30%
rise in EPS over the 4Q run-rate. This is predicated on a weaker currency (Rs53/US$),
a US$1/bbl rebound in GRMs and higher other income but we concede downside risks.
Triggers may emerge by end 2012 but may be short-lived
We expect the EPS momentum to start rebounding when the polyester expansions
begin to come on-stream from early 2013. By this time, we expect the 4G telecom
launch, indications of higher gas prices and more detail on the retail foray to help.
These triggers are likely to short-lived, however, as singular variables may not be
enough for a re-rating. For example, while higher gas prices will renew the E&P thrust,
NAV impact is limited (US$1 = 1.5%) while EPS impact (US$1 = ~3%) will accrue only
from FY15. Similarly, our telecom analyst cautions that infra challenges and lack of a
4G device eco-system may force Reliance to bundle 2G voice implying higher capex.
Reliance needs to build a deep portfolio of projects in the core energy chain
In our view, therefore, Reliance needs to create a portfolio of +15-20 projects like its
global energy peers have, to rekindle investor interest. Historically, sustained project
growth has driven stock performance by driving EPS growth across cycles. This is now
sorely missing; ten year profit Cagr has dipped below 20% for the first time in history.
Reliance can take on another ~US$30bn of projects but has been reticent
Reliance has been more reticent on new projects than we had expected it to be,
though; perhaps because of poor returns from the US$17bn KG-D6, RPET projects and
the +50% fall in US gas prices since the time it acquired its shale gas assets. For
example, gross block will be flat over FY10-15 despite US$12bn outlay on downstream
projects as the olefins, IGCC projects are yet to commence in earnest. Indeed, given
its cash (US$15bn), operating cashflow (US$6-7bn annually) and capital serving
needs, it can easily invest an additional ~US$30bn without stressing its balance sheet.
Non-core investments have been a drag on returns and stock performance
Further, these projects may need to be in the core energy chain. Its ~US$8.5bn noncore
investments (~20% of balance sheet) across multiple verticals have been a drag
shaving off ~3ppt from ROACE; the retail venture, for example, is still incurring losses
even after five years of operation. Nonetheless, with the stock trading at 11x PE and a
25% discount to our NAV and triggers emerging by end-2012, we maintain O-PF.

May 13: Pivotals: Reliance Industries, SBI, Tata Steel, Infosys:: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��

Pivotals: Reliance Industries (697.3)


In line with our expectation, the stock declined last week. It registered a 52-week low at Rs 671 on May 8. The stock has slumped 4 per cent and is presently testing the key medium-term support zone between Rs 690 and Rs 700. A conclusive breakthrough of this support will be the cue for initiating fresh short positions in the stock. In that case, the stock can decline and test its next support at Rs 671.
Next key medium-term support is at Rs 650.
Medium-term trend has been down for the stock from its early February peak of Rs 864.
This trend remains in place as long as the stock trades below Rs 790. Short-term trend is also down and the stock is hovering well below its 21 and 50-day moving averages. Important resistances for the week ahead are positioned at Rs 720, Rs 733 and Rs 755.
Infosys (Rs 2,311.8)
The stock dived 5.3 per cent in the previous week, strongly breaking through its long-term support at around Rs 2,360. With this decline, the stock appears to have resumed its medium-term downtrend that has been in place since this February high of Rs 2,990.
Traders with short-term perspective can consider selling the stock with stop-loss at Rs 2,360. Downside targets are Rs 2,270 and Rs 2,200, which is a key support level.
Key resistances for the stock above Rs 2,360 are at Rs 2,405, Rs 2,485 and Rs 2,540, the floor level of recent gap. Important medium-term resistance is pegged at Rs 2,600.
State Bank of India (Rs 1,852.2)
SBI continued its decline by tumbling 7 per cent last week. This decline has decisively breached the 200-day moving average and a key support at Rs 2,000. However, the stock is now testing the next key support around Rs 1,850.
The daily indicators and oscillators are hovering in the oversold levels. Further the stock is testing its daily Bollinger band's lower boundary indicating oversold. An upward reversal from the current support can lead to a corrective rally to Rs 1,936 or Rs 2,000 in the near-term.
As long as the stock trades below its significant resistance level at Rs 2,130 its medium-term trend remains down. A strong nose-dive below Rs 1,850 will reinforce the stock's downtrend and pull it down to Rs 1,776 and then to Rs 1,715 levels in the medium-tem.
Tata Steel (Rs 411.7)
The stock plunged 5 per cent in the previous week. It has emphatically breached its moving average compression (21, 50 and 200-day moving averages) around Rs 450. Short-term trend is down for the stock.
Traders with short-tem horizon can consider holding their short positions with stop-loss at Rs 425. Downside targets are Rs 400 and then Rs 393.
The stock's daily relative strength index and daily moving average convergence divergence indicators are hovering in the bearish zone implying downward momentum.
Important resistance is positioned at Rs 440.
Nevertheless, a strong rally above this level will push the stock 460 and then to Rs 470. Resistances above Rs 470 are pegged at Rs 490 and Rs 500.

Tata Motors: Volume surprise continues :CLSA

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Volume surprise continues
JLR’s volumes have continued to surprise on the upside with Feb and Mar
volumes coming in 5-16% above estimates boosted by strong Evoque
demand. Rising proportion of China in volumes, operating leverage benefits
and stable currencies have also improved margin outlook for JLR. In India,
LCV and car volumes have improved in 4Q and profit outlook for India
business is also improving. We upgrade FY13-14 EPS by 16-18% factoring in
higher volumes in both JLR and India and anticipate upgrades by street in
weeks ahead. We upgrade Tata Motors from O-PF to BUY with a TP of Rs370.
JLR’s volumes continue to surprise positively
JLR’s monthly global sales improved further in March with volumes at 36.5K units
rising 51% YoY and 16% above estimates. This is the second month in a row that
volumes have beaten our estimates handsomely. Evoque sales seem to have
stabilized at the 10K level and demand outlook for the vehicle remains robust. The
recent addition of a third shift at the Halewood plant has effectively increased
JLR’s total annual capacity to 390-400K units – enough for FY13 and debottlenecking
measures are being planned to take the capacity further up by
FY14. Industry premium vehicle demand remains strong as evidenced by the
monthly sales of JLR’s peers. More important, China sales of the industry were
also strong over Feb and Mar, which should allay concerns of slowing China
demand. We upgrade FY13/14 JLR volumes by 7% to 391K/422K units.
Improving margin outlook at JLR as well
Operating leverage benefits from higher volumes are fairly meaningful for JLR.
Share of China in volumes has improved from 17% in 3Q to 19% in 4Q and
should improve further in FY13. The principal currencies relevant to JLR’s margins
have been stable from 3Q to 4Q. This has improved our outlook for JLR’s margins
and we now build in 18.6% EBITDA margins over FY13-14 (~17.5% previously).
Rising LCV and car volumes in India
India LCV volumes have improved substantially in 2HFY12 and we expect strong
growth in FY13 backed by higher capacity at the Pantnagar and Dharwad plants.
The launch of a new platform for non-Ace LCVs will also boost volumes in FY13.
India car volumes (incl Nano) have picked up in 2H. However, outlook for trucks
remains subdued with industry growth slowing down to -4% in Mar-12.We
upgrade Tata’s India volumes by 9-10% factoring in higher LCV/car volumes.
Upgrading FY13-14 EPS by 16-18%; upgrade from O-PF to BUY
We now build in JLR’s capex at £2bn per year (£1.5bn before). Our estimates are
12-14% above consensus and we anticipate EPS upgrades by the street in coming
weeks. A strong response to the new Range Rover platform that will be launched
by end-CY12 could drive further upgrades to FY14 EPS. Upgrade to BUY.

Punj Lloyd- Above expectation EBITDA counterbalanced by high finance cost :Goldman Sachs

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


EARNINGS REVIEW
Punj Lloyd (PUJL.BO)
Neutral Equity Research
Above expectation EBITDA counterbalanced by high finance cost
What surprised us
Punj Lloyd reported 4QFY12 revenues of Rs 30.4bn, above Street estimate
of Rs 27.2bn, but in-line with our estimate. EBITDA came in 24%/32%
above GS/Bloomberg consensus, as the company reported improvement
in EBITDA margin (260 bps qoq) due to lower contractor charges and forex
gains. Higher interest expenses in the quarter (up 15% qoq) resulted in net
income of Rs 90mn, down 49% yoy. Weak order inflow in 4Q (Rs 10.5bn,
67% below GS estimate) resulted in closing order book declining by 4%
qoq to Rs 273bn.
What to do with the stock
Punj Lloyd has now shown a better execution pace compared to the last
two years, while also improving order backlog coverage (2.6X on FY12
revenues). However we continue to be concerned on low and volatile
margins, high leverage (1.54X Net Debt to Equity as of FY12) and decline
in order inflows in Q4. The mix of inflows for the company has also
improved recently with 38% from pipeline segment over the last 12m but
margins on these highly competitively bid orders could be low compared
to history. We retain our Neutral rating for the stock and raise our
FY13/14E EPS by 11/5% based on slightly better margins and execution
rate. Consequently our P/B based 12m TP increases to Rs 58 (from Rs 57
earlier) which implies 10X multiple on FY13E earnings. The stock trades at
12-m fwd P/B of 0.5X which in our view is justified by the 6% ROE we
expect it to generate in FY13E. Key isks: upside: higher than expected
order inflow; downside: higher commodity prices, delay in pick-up of
capex.

Educomp Solutions Not convinced about overall governance :Esprito

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Educomp Solutions
Not convinced about overall governance
Educomp’s fortunes appear to be declining fast in light of reduced
funding from banks. We reiterate our view that the SPE will be
consolidated once India converges to IFRS from 2013 onwards which
will lead to negative OCF and FCF and D/E c.2:1. Management now
has admitted this. Our concerns on overall governance policies go
further, principally: a common address of the auditor and the
registered office of Edu Smart; cost allocation of resource
coordinators and high turnover of company secretaries at Edu
Smart. We change corporate governance rating from Amber to Red,
lower our FV from Rs220 to Rs110 and downgrade our stance from
Neutral to Sell.
See no improvement in stretched cash flow situation
We turned our long-running SELL stance on Educomp (since May 2009) to
Neutral in August 2011 citing valuation. Our key thesis then was that an 80%
fall in the stock price was factoring in most of the core business and overall
governance issues. However, we now see growing reasons to question the
sustainability of the core business model and also highlight some new
governance issues which need answering by management. With Educomp’s K-
12 initiative not growing as per expectations and its core business, Smart Class,
likely to falter on growth due to funding requirements, we think that there are
likely to be further earnings downgrades.
• Incremental securitization of smart class difficult – At the start of the
model, Edu Smart used to get Rs60 for every Rs79 securitized from banks
meaning a cost of debt of 10%. This quickly declined to Rs54 for every
Rs79 securitized resulting in cost of debt of 14% and zero cash balance for
Edu Smart at the end of year 1. While we had expected in May 2011 that
this funding would fall to Rs50 due to rising securitization costs, it has
actually declined to 45. Now either Educomp is paying securitization costs
of 22.25% in return for Rs79 securitized or it is securitising only Rs65 to
keep the rate at 14%. The shortfall of Rs14 implies that Edu Smart will find
it incrementally difficult to pay Educomp, thus stretching its cash flows.
• K-12 segment not that strong as perceived – Our channel checks of
Educomp’s K-12 schools in 2012 suggest no major improvement over 2011,
especially in schools which have been operational for more than 3-4 years.
The only segment that could have helped Educomp in offsetting concerns
of its core business is the K-12 segment, but things are not improving
enough to make any meaningful impact.
• Overall governance issues in the SPE are questionable: In our research
we notice that the statutory auditor of Edu Smart and registered address
of Edu Smart is same. We believe this compromises independence,
especially given any sense of excessive closeness between company and
auditor will naturally concern investors given longstanding concerns about
the structure of Edu Smart. Additionally, we are concerned about the cost
allocation of resource coordinators which should have been booked by
Edu Smart but is being booked by Educomp which is negative for minority
shareholders of Educomp. Furthermore, the high turnover of company
secretaries at Edu Smart also makes us uncomfortable on overall
governance policies.
Valuation: structurally declining model of core business
In our opinion, securitisation has always been a precursor to a big downfall
and Educomp must have learnt this by now. Educomp currently trades at a
FY13E P/E of 11.6. Our research indicates that growth in the smart class
segment (60% of revenues and 90% of EBIT) is set to deteriorate as
securitization of smart classes becomes incrementally more difficult.
Moreover we are wary about the corporate governance standards of the
company. We downgrade our EPS estimates by 50%. SELL Educomp.

Ranbaxy Labs: Risk-reward turns less favourable :JM Financial,

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Risk-reward turns less favourable
Base margins appear to have improved: Ranbaxy reported 1QCY12 net
profits of `12.5bn (310% YoY). This included US Lipitor sales of $306mn
(JMFe). Adjusting for Lipitor net profits of `5.6bn and post-tax MTM forex
gains of `940mn (`750mn as part of the other income + `190mn as part of
the interest expense), adjusted net profit was `2.4bn (300% YoY; JMFe:
`1.0bn). Base sales at $430mn (9% YoY) were 9% below JMFe. Adjusted EBITDA
(excl Lipitor) at `3.4bn appear higher than JMFe (`2.4bn) primarily on account
of lower raw material costs. Base RM margins have improved almost by
180bps on a sequential basis. Management mentioned that this improvement
will sustain. The improvement was due to various factors such as product mix,
level of imports and currency. Staff costs were in-line with JMFe. The payment
to Teva as part of the Lipitor launch may have remained at levels similar to
4QCY11 (c.50%). Given the presence of significant FTF revenues (along with
the profit share with Teva) and currency volatility, it may be difficult to identify
the drivers for the improvement in base margins. R&D expense was $22mn for
the quarter.
Update on consent decree in 3QCY11: Domestic sales at $99mn grew by
13% in INR terms. The growth in consumer division ($15mn) was strong at
20%. Slower growth in domestic market is due to higher exposure to antiinfectives.
Base US sales at $95mn are likely to be driven by Caduet and
Nexium supply. In the Atorva market, Ranbaxy has a 47% share with 60-70%
price erosion. Sales of Atorva from Mohali are not reflected in 1Q12 numbers.
Ranbaxy will provide an assessment of additional costs to implement the
consent decree in 3QCY12. The company has finalized the consultants who
are expected to visit the facility in 2QCY12, post which the FDA inspection is
expected. Ranbaxy reiterated that large scale infrastructure additions may not
be required as part of the consent decree process given the investments done
by the company over the last couple of years. The company did not provide
any capex guidance but expects investments to be higher than CY11. It plans
to set up a facility in Nigeria during the current year.
Maintain BUY; increase Dec’12 TP to `540: We increase CY12/13E EPS by
32%/13% primarily due to higher margins. We increase our Dec’12 TP to `540
from `485. Our TP is based on 18x CY13 EPS (`26) and P-IV value of `70. The
US PDUFA date for Isotretinoin is scheduled for 29th May’12 which is a near
term trigger. Our estimates already factor sales from this product in CY13.

Multi Commodity exchange Multiple Growth drivers ahead, initiate Coverage with Buy "Sunidhi

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Exchanges globally have been businesses with strong monopoly status, robust EBIDTA margins, low capex requirements, negative working capital cycle which enable high free cash flow generation and robust dividend payout ratios. MCX, India’s first listed exchange is the largest commodity exchange with 87% market share appears to have multiple triggers for its business growth predominantly driven by regulatory outcomes. Though the exchange is the largest commodity exchange in India and the third largest in the world in terms of volumes of contracts traded, its breadth has been shallow with four commodities (gold, silver, crude, copper) together accounting to 90% of the total turnover value. MCX has benefited from the appreciation of commodity prices during (FY09-FY12) as its revenue model is depended on the value of the contracts traded. We believe that going forward there are multiple triggers on the volume growth front depending on the regulatory outcomes which include Introduction of options and indices trading in commodities, allowing banks, mutual funds and foreign institutional investors to trade in commodity exchanges etc. Global exchanges have been trading at wide P/E bands (15x-23x on forward earnings) depending on the exchange portfolio mix, revenues, margins and profits trends. Considering growth triggers we value MCX at P/E of 20x on FY14E EPS which yields a TP of `1320/Share. Initiate with Buy.
Options and commodity indices introduction could boost volumes
FCRA bill which allows introduction of commodity options, commodity indices and Institutional participation in commodity exchanges is awaiting the parliament approval. We believe that MCX’s strong parentage in technology (MCX is promoted by FT) would enable quicker launch of new product portfolio post the regulatory outcomes which could act as growth driver for volumes. Globally options account 17%-25% of the total transaction volumes in commodities and introduction of options and indices at MCX could act as substantial volume booster for the exchange. Further MCX is likely to introduce new products like Real estate indices, Rain indices etc which could act as growth drivers. FCRA bill clearance would also allow banks, institutions and FII’s to participate in commodity trading which could boost the exchange turnover.
Non linearity enables sustaining the robust EBIDTA margins
MCX has seen solid EBIDTA margin expansion with current EBIDTA margin at over 65% for nine months ended Dec 2011 driven by non linearity in the model up from 36% registered in FY09. MCX pays software & support charges (`one hundred and Twenty million + 12.5% of its gross transaction revenues) to Financial Technologies Ltd (which provides platforms), which is the only variable cost. The remaining cost structure includes salary and other administrative costs and hence inducing non linearity to the margin structure.
Multiple catalysts to drive the stock performance going ahead
MCX has 5% stake in MCX-SX as well as 634mn warrants and holding structure is under litigation with SEBI. FCRA bill approval, outcome of MCX-SX litigation could be the key catalysts which should drive stock performance going ahead.

Sizzling Stocks: Indian Bank ,Rallis India :: Business Line,

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��

Sizzling Stocks: Indian Bank (Rs 179.6)

The stock was in a medium-term downtrend, in place since this February peak of Rs 253. This trend accelerated last week and the stock slumped 8.5 per cent on Friday following its disappointing fourth quarter numbers.
For the week, the stock has tumbled 14 per cent with good volumes. But it is testing a key long-term support band between Rs 170 and Rs 180. Its daily indicators and oscillators are hovering in the oversold territory. The stock has breached the daily Bollinger bands' lower boundary implying oversold.
An upward reversal from the aforesaid support band can push the stock higher to Rs 195 and to Rs 210 in the short-term. A strong rally above Rs 225 is needed to alter its downtrend and take the stock higher to Rs 245.
On the other hand, an emphatic breakthrough of the Rs 170 support will strengthen the stock's downtrend and pave the way for a medium-term decline to Rs 154 and then to Rs 142.
Rallis India (Rs 124.9)
The stock gained 10.5 per cent in the previous week. It is currently testing its intermediate-term down trendline that has been in place from October 2011 peak of Rs 185 and a key resistance around Rs 130. Breach of this resistance will take the stock higher to Rs 140 which is a significant long-term resistance.
Next important resistances are positioned at Rs 150 and Rs 160. Only a conclusive breakthrough of Rs 160 will alter the downtrend and push the stock northwards to
Rs 180. The inability to surpass the resistance level of Rs 140 will confine the stock to trading broadly between Rs 115 and Rs 140. However, a fall below Rs 115 can drag the stock lower to Rs 103. Subsequent support for the stock is at Rs 94.

What helped MFs to stay ahead of equity markets :: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Technical Query Corner: Titan, canara bank, JSW steel, Rohit Ferro, Crompton Greaves, Honeywell, Bosch, :: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Please advise on the outlook for Bosch and Honeywell Automation India. Can I buy and hold them for long-term?
N.S. Ganesan
Bosch (Rs 9,005.9): Bosch continues to be a trail-blazer in 2012 as well. The stock is up 35 per cent so far this year.
The stock is in a strong structural uptrend since the March 2009 low. This uptrend will be threatened only if the stock goes on to close below Rs 6,425. Subsequent supports for the stock would be Rs 6,062 and Rs 5,314.
Medium-term supports for the stock are at Rs 8,164 and Rs 7,501. Investors with short- to medium-term horizon can accumulate the stock on declines as long as it trades above Rs 7,500.
Immediate target for the stock is Rs 10,162. Long-term target for the stock is at Rs 11,032.
Honeywell Automation (Rs 2,477.3): Honeywell Automation is in a long-term down move since the July 2010 peak of Rs 3,010. But this decline has halted at the key long-term support at Rs 1,663 and the stock is once again reversing from its long-term resistance band between Rs 3,000 and Rs 3,300. Investors with short-term perspective can divest their holdings when the stock nears this resistance band.
Medium-term support for the stock is at Rs 2,280 and this can serve as support for medium-term investors. Long-term support for investors is, however, at Rs 1,620. Investors need to start worrying only on a strong close below this level. Long-term target on close above Rs 3,350 is Rs 4,097.

No regulatory vacuums, says SEBI :: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


In 2008, large pools of money were used to play the market, without anybody even having an idea of the dimension of the problem.
‘If you are raising money in India, you need to submit to our regulations.' That is the guiding principle behind SEBI's recent moves to regulate portfolio managers, venture funds and other investment entities, says the SEBI Chairman, Mr U.K. Sinha. Excerpts from an interview.
Your recent regulation was on alternative investment funds such as private equity, venture capital funds and so on. These are vehicles for informed investors. Why the regulation?
SEBI has two guiding principles. One is investor protection and the other is containing systemic risk. In 2008, large pools of money were used to play the stock market, without anybody even having an idea of the dimension of the problem. If we had the data on these funds, we may have been alerted to the crash. That is why we would like to regulate alternative investment funds. If you are setting up a PE, VC or hedge fund, you cannot collect less than Rs 1 crore. And anyone collecting above Rs 1 crore per investor has to register with us and be regulated.
On investor protection, we are looking at a hierarchy of regulations. For mutual funds, where one can invest Rs 500-1,000, regulations will be tight, as these are uninformed investors. Alternative investments will have light-touch regulations. We have set the threshold at Rs 1 crore. The idea is that the uninformed retail investor will be permitted to invest only in areas where regulation is tight.
So was there a regulatory vacuum in terms of large entities raising money and not being regulated?
Yes. Previously there was no requirement that all venture funds must register with SEBI. Now that has been changed. All venture capital funds which raise domestic money need to be registered with us. The concept is that if anyone is raising money in India they need to be registered with us. If they don't register, they are violating rules.
To give an example, in 2005, 2006 and 2007, many firms raised money for real-estate. They pooled small sums of money such as Rs 5 lakh and that went into real-estate funds. Now, even for activities like that, the minimum investment is Rs 1 crore. Now, some people may not be happy with that. But we feel that these vehicles are not suitable for small investors.
The original concept paper asked alternative funds to register under seven categories. You have now reduced that to three broader categories. Why?
We felt that administrating the seven categories will pose a problem. Besides, the firms felt that water-tight compartments will restrict their mandate.
Therefore, we tweaked this based on whether alternate funds get some concessions from the government. Venture funds invest mainly in unlisted securities. They get regulatory forbearance, for instance, a pass-through status on taxes because we feel they are a good means to promote entrepreneurship. The second category is private equity, which can invest in public securities. They too get certain facilities from the government. These two categories need to accept restrictions, they can't use leverage.
The third category is hedge funds, which don't get any facilities from the government and are allowed to leverage. Hedge funds globally do rely on leverage and to restrict this would be not be in keeping with trends across the world.
However having said this, we have to watch the extent to which they are allowed to borrow and the size of such funds in the Indian market. For this they need to be registered. For instance in 2006, 2007, many such firms raised $ 1-2 billion funds and nobody did much about them. But this applies only to funds raising money from Indian investors. Hedge funds and others who raise money from abroad will come under the FII regulations.
You spoke of filling the regulatory vacuum. What about collective investment schemes such as teak schemes, gold bonds and so on?
Yes I agree there are grey areas there. Now, collective investment schemes are to be regulated by SEBI. But we find that very few schemes are willing to submit themselves; they usually claim that they are not collective investment schemes. They are generally taking advantage of the Chit Fund Act or are NBFCs.
In one or two States, this activity has been going on in a big way. The money is often collected from remote areas. We have issued orders in some cases against such firms, but they have gone to Court over this. In the case of collective investment schemes, we need clarity on who the enforcement agency is.

IPCA LAB-Buy--Tracking Technicals : Anand Rathi

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


SCRIP NAME : IPCA LAB                                            SECTOR  : PHARMACEUTICALS                                                             Date : 10th May, 2012.

CURRENT TREND : BULLISH                 Time Horizon : 3 Months         Buy in the Range of  Rs.350-360              Stop loss Rs.332( Closing Basis)

TARGETS :       1st Target: Rs.402
2nd Target: Rs.430


SUPPORTING TECHNICAL COMMENTS

IPCALAB- Rs.358 has broken out from multiple top of Rs.350 and has made all time high of Rs.375 and has seen a throw-back. Now stock can soon consolidate and move higher and target of Rs.402 & 425 is possible in the stock in next 2-3months. Stock trades above all major averages, with 20DMA Rs.352, 100DMA Rs.319 and 200DMA Rs.299. On weekly charts the stock has shown  a V-Shape recovery which is normally very positive.

Thanks & Regards

52-WEEK FLOP: BSE METALS INDEX :: Business Line,

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Weighing a duty to protect steel :: Business Line,

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Indian steel firms have demanded imposition of higher duty on imports, apprehensive of dumping by China.
The firms argue that if the substantial investments they have made in creating domestic capacity are not protected, they will be forced to wind up shop.
The threat is one of sizeable imports from China swamping the market. A rough estimation shows that steel could be imported from China at prices lower than domestic rates.
For instance, SAIL's domestically-produced 2 mm hot-rolled coil commanded a price of Rs 38,500 (about $722.32 at an exchange rate of Rs 53.3 to the dollar) per tonne at the factory gate in April.
In contrast, the price of 2 mm HR coil in China is approximately $672.1 per tonne at present. Even after factoring in the current 5 per cent import duty and freight of around $30 per tonne, this takes up the landed cost of Chinese steel to around $735.7 per tonne. This is less than the price of domestically produced steel if local excise duty and other taxes are added.

CAPACITY TO INCREASE

At the same time, the sizeable investment made by the domestic steel companies needs to be taken into consideration. India is presently the fourth largest steel producer in the world, with an estimated production capacity of about 89 million tonnes per annum at the end of 2011-12. The Working Group on Steel for the 12th Plan has estimated that capacity will rise to 149 million tonnes by 2016-17.
If all this capacity does materialise, it may exceed domestic requirements. The Working Group on Steel for the 12th Plan expects domestic steel demand to go up by 10.3 per cent on an average annually to 113.3 million tonnes per annum by 2016-17.
The question, however, is whether this capacity will come up in time to meet India's ambitious target of $1 trillion in infrastructure spending for the current Plan.
One argument against the demand for higher import duty is that the country should allow a free play of market forces in the steel sector. Both exports and imports can be allowed so that domestic producers can take best advantage of global price cycles. In this way, the infrastructure sector too gets to source steel at global rates. After all, the Indian steel industry has withstood international competition over the past decade despite reducing basic Customs duty on steel from 25-30 per cent in 2002-03 to 5 per cent currently.

PRICING ISSUES

In April-December, 2010-11, imports accounted for about 9 per cent of domestic requirements.
In addition, there is a high likelihood of the domestic steel prices going up further amid a drastic shortage of raw materials and rupee depreciation that has pushed up costs.
In such a scenario, the gap between international and domestic steel prices could widen significantly, resulting in a situation where home-grown manufacturers are rendered uncompetitive.
If the domestic capacity-addition plans progress as per schedule, the requirement for steel would be comfortably met within the country.
However, in the absence of assured demand, projects depending on the additional capacity would be rendered unviable.
At the same time, affording Indian steel-makers an uneven playing field could skew pricing dynamics further, resulting in a huge differential in the cost of domestic and international steel. The Government needs to take these factors into consideration while taking any decision.

Stock Strategy: Short Reliance Ind, Bata India :: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Short strangle on Reliance Ind may pay
Reliance Industries: The outlook remains negative for Reliance Industries. Immediate resistance appears at Rs 735 and the support at Rs 686. A close below the support could push the stock towards Rs 589. Key resistances are at Rs 825 and Rs 941.
F&O pointers: Reliance Industries witnessed unwinding of close to 4 lakh shares in open interest positions on Friday. This indicates that traders are not willing to carry over their positions. Option trading also indicates negative bias, as puts shed open interest positions.
Strategy: Traders can consider a short strangle on Reliance Industries. This can be initiated by selling 680 put and 720 call. The options closed at Rs 10.85 and Rs 7.45 respectively.
Short strangle strategy is best suited when one expects the underlying equity to move in a narrow range.
While the maximum profit is the premium collected (roughly about Rs 4,500), the loss could be unlimited if Reliance Industries breaches past the Rs 680-720 band. Maximum profit occurs if the underlying of the stock remains between these strikes.
But note that writing (selling) options involve higher margin commitments. So this strategy is best suited for traders, who can bear that risk. Consider this strategy for two weeks.
Bata India: The long-term outlook remains positive for Bata India as long as it stays above Rs 675. However, the stock could face some pressure going forward in the immediate-term. It faces resistance at Rs 863 and support at Rs 816.
A close below Rs 816 could drag Bata India to Rs 765. If the stock sustains above Rs 775, it has the potential to reach new heights. In that event, Bata can touch Rs 1,025, its next resistance level according to Fibonacci projections.
F&O pointers: The Bata India futures shed open interest despite scoring handsome gains on Friday, signalling negative bias. Options are not active.
Strategy: Consider shorting Bata India with a tight stop-loss at Rs 863 (spot price on a closing day basis) for an initial target of Rs 765. If the stock moves below Rs 816, shift the stop-loss to that level.
Key risks: Bata is a high beta stock and will fluctuate wildly. So this strategy is for traders who can afford to stomach that risk.
Follow-up: Last week, we had advised shorting of Educomp Solutions and ITC futures.
As expected Educomp Solutions displayed weak trend. Traders could hold the counter with a revised stop-loss of Rs 175 for the target of Rs 147.
ITC achieved the recommended target of Rs 224 during the intra-week dealings. We had also recommended writing of 180 call on Educomp Solutions and 240 call on ITC. Both the positions are currently in-the-money. Traders can consider holding it for one more week for maximum profits.

Cost of porting mobile numbers :: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Upset with your mobile operator for overcharging? Fed up with dropped calls?
Or worse still, stuck with an operator whose license was cancelled? In all these cases, porting your number may be the way out.
The procedure is simple. However, you need to keep in mind factors such as what to do with your existing balance, your unpaid bills (if post paid), porting charges and tariff of the new player, before shifting loyalties.

SIMPLE PORTING

All you need to do is to send a message (PORT ) to 1900; in return, you would receive a porting code.
You need to make note of this code and give it to your new operator, along with documents such as address proof.
Remember, you must have spent a minimum of 90 days with your current operator before porting out.
The new operator will give you a SIM card.
Porting between providers takes around 7 working days and you will receive a message in your mobile about the exact date and time of porting.
There would be no service, but only for a couple of hours, usually starting from the midnight prior to your confirmed porting date.
That done, you are now free from the tyranny of your old operator and can enjoy better service.

THE COST FACTOR

The cost of porting is fixed at Rs 19 by the telecom regulator.
But there are important points to note.
If you are a pre-paid customer and have opted for porting, you will forego all the balance once you change service providers as it cannot be carried forward.
So, make sure you exhaust it before you port out.
If you are a post-paid customer, you will have to show your last paid bill to the new operator.
Also, from your billing date to the porting date, you will continue to be charged by your old service provider.
So, if your billing date is 10th of every month and you port out on 20th, you will have to pay for the 10 days' usage.
There is no running away from these charges!

THE RIGHT PLAN

The last aspect is that of tariffs of the new operator. Be careful about choosing the right plan so that you don't end up paying through your nose.
The telecom regulator has mandated that all mobile service companies must offer at least one ‘per-second' plan to customers.
So if you have been on a per-second billing mode, you can continue to be so with your new operator, albeit with some minor changes in total charges.

Index Outlook: Stocks search for a floor :: Business Line

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


SECTOR TOPPER: BSE FMCG INDEX :: Business Line,

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


MOIL - BUY :: Business Line,

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��




Investors could consider buying shares in manganese producer MOIL. Attractive valuations after the sharp dip in share price over the last year, and the company's plans to double output makes for a compelling investment case.
The company's enterprise value (EV) discounts its trailing 12-month operating profits by 4.3 times. This is at a discount to earlier levels and does not fully capture the company's dominant domestic market position and low-cost operations. The cost advantage along with cash reserves of around Rs 2000 crore and zero-debt status provides the company an edge over competition and gives it sufficient headroom for expansion plans.

REALISATION DROP IN 2011

MOIL provides roughly 40 per cent of India's over two million tonnes of annual manganese requirement. About 90 per cent of this is used by steel-makers who produce ferro-alloys to toughen up their steel products. Manganese consumption moves lock-step with steel consumption.
In the calendar year 2011, global manganese production rose by around nine per cent. This was higher than the 6.8 per cent growth registered in global steel consumption. The excess production weighed on global manganese prices. High inventory build-up in China, coupled with a supply glut from geographies such as South Africa and Indonesia, impacted prices. By end-2011, manganese prices had slipped by 40 per cent from the start of the year.
MOIL's sales and profits for the nine months ended December 2011 have shown the strain. Net sales slipped by 21.4 per cent to Rs 698 crore as price cuts undertaken in latter part of 2011 lowered average realisations.
MOIL's operating margins, which have traditionally hovered between 60 and 70 per cent since FY08, fell to 50 per cent during the nine month period. The 47 per cent higher other income of Rs 140 crore earned on its cash holdings during the period did stem the drop in net profits, which slipped by 31 per cent to Rs 311 crore. The resultant dip in investor sentiment caused the stock price to dip.

TURNAROUND POSSIBLE

MOIL needs better volumes and realisations to turn things around. The latter may be on the way. The Indonesian government slapped a 20 per cent levy on exports of manganese ore starting this month. Indonesia is a major exporter of manganese and the levy could make things tough for high-cost capacity in the country.
BHP Billitonhiked rates on manganese shipments from Australia. These early signs bode well for MOIL, which will benefit from increase in global rates. A weaker rupee also makes imports of manganese more expensive, this again works in MOIL's favour.
In the long run, freight costs incurred by inland ferro-alloy companies to import manganese could also provide an edge to MOIL. The company banks on the fact that new manganese mine additions are expensive.
The company's cost of production ranks among the lowest in the industry. This bestows it with high margins and staying power.
MOIL's production cost has been rising over the last five years on account of increased wage bills and spending more to increase mine output. But the company expects increased output in the coming years to more than compensate for higher costs.

OUTPUT BOOST NEEDED

MOIL currently produces around one million tonnes of manganese products. Volumes have remained stagnant over the last few years. Higher volumes, an essential imperative, may materialise over the next three-four years.
The necessary regulatory approvals to increase output are in place.
India's current steel production capacity is around 75 million tonnes per annum. . The country's target of achieving steel production of 100 million tonnes per annum by 2012 could take a year or two more. As steel production improves, MOIL has incentive to produce more manganese.
The company aims to double its mine output by 2016 to over two million tonnes . Risks facing the company include competition from domestic producers. . Additionally, imports will remain a threat. Further delays in domestic steel capacity additions will also hurt the company.