Showing posts with label Biocon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Biocon. Show all posts
29 January 2015
10 December 2014
Biocon, Lupin, Prism Cement & KPR Mills reports: Indianivesh
CLICK links to Read MORE reports on:
Biocon,
KPR Mills,
lupin,
Prism Cement
27 October 2014
24 January 2014
Affordable medicine We maintain Buy on Biocon:: Centrum
Affordable medicine
We maintain Buy rating and target price of Rs555 for Biocon based on 18xDec’15 EPS
of Rs30.8. Despite lower revenue growth, Biocon’s EBIDTA and net profit for Q3FY14
were in line with our expectations. The company reported good growth in domestic
formulations and research service segments. Lower R & D spend led to margin
improvement during the quarter. Biocon has launched world’s first biosimilar
Herceptin under the brand name CANMAb in India. With registration of rh-insulin in
over 50 countries, it is poised for good growth in FY15 when its Malaysian facility for
insulin is expected to go on stream. Key risks to our assumptions are stiff competition
from other global players and change in clinical trials environment in India.
CRAMS business to drive growth: Biocon reported moderate sales growth of 11%YoY
driven by its CRAMS segment consisting of Syngene and Clinigene. The company’s
biopharma business (60% of revenues) grew by 2%YoY to Rs4.18bn from Rs4.09bn.
Domestic formulations (14% of revenues) grew by 16%YoY to Rs992mn from Rs855mn.
Biocon’s CRAMS business (26% of revenues) grew by 32%YoY to Rs1.84bn from
Rs1.40bn. We expect the CRAMS business to report good growth due to its association
with 5 major global clients.
Low R & D spends lead to margin improvement: Biocon’s EBIDTA margin improved
190bps to 24.2% from 22.3%, mainly due to low R & D spend and reduction in material
cost. The company’s material cost declined by 20bps to 48.2% from 48.4% due to strong
growth in CRAMS segment. Personnel cost grew by 140bps to 15.2% from 13.8% due to
annual rise in salaries. Biocon’s other expenses declined by 310bps to 12.4% from 15.5%
due to decline in R & D expenses. Its R & D expenses declined by 53%YoY to Rs230mn
from Rs490mn.
Moderate rise in net profit: Biocon’s net profit for the quarter grew by 15%YoY to
Rs1,050mn from Rs917mn due to improvement in EBIDTA margin, decline in interest
cost and lower tax rate. The company’s interest cost declined by 90%YoY to Rs3mn from
Rs29mn due to debt repayment. Its tax rate declined to 19.1% from 21.4%. Biocon’s all
hedging contracts for BMS expired in Q2FY14 and hence the hedging cost has come
down.
Recommendation and key risks: At the CMP of Rs451, Biocon trades at 22.6x FY14E
EPS of Rs20.0 and 17.2x FY15E EPS of Rs26.2 and 14.0x FY16E EPS of Rs32.2. We maintain
Buy rating on the scrip with a target price of Rs555 based on 18x Dec’15 EPS of Rs30.8
with an upside of 23% from CMP. Key risks to our assumptions are competition from
other global players in emerging markets. Moreover, the recent changes in the clinical
trial environment may lead to transferring some clinical trials to other countries
resulting in higher cost.
We maintain Buy rating and target price of Rs555 for Biocon based on 18xDec’15 EPS
of Rs30.8. Despite lower revenue growth, Biocon’s EBIDTA and net profit for Q3FY14
were in line with our expectations. The company reported good growth in domestic
formulations and research service segments. Lower R & D spend led to margin
improvement during the quarter. Biocon has launched world’s first biosimilar
Herceptin under the brand name CANMAb in India. With registration of rh-insulin in
over 50 countries, it is poised for good growth in FY15 when its Malaysian facility for
insulin is expected to go on stream. Key risks to our assumptions are stiff competition
from other global players and change in clinical trials environment in India.
CRAMS business to drive growth: Biocon reported moderate sales growth of 11%YoY
driven by its CRAMS segment consisting of Syngene and Clinigene. The company’s
biopharma business (60% of revenues) grew by 2%YoY to Rs4.18bn from Rs4.09bn.
Domestic formulations (14% of revenues) grew by 16%YoY to Rs992mn from Rs855mn.
Biocon’s CRAMS business (26% of revenues) grew by 32%YoY to Rs1.84bn from
Rs1.40bn. We expect the CRAMS business to report good growth due to its association
with 5 major global clients.
Low R & D spends lead to margin improvement: Biocon’s EBIDTA margin improved
190bps to 24.2% from 22.3%, mainly due to low R & D spend and reduction in material
cost. The company’s material cost declined by 20bps to 48.2% from 48.4% due to strong
growth in CRAMS segment. Personnel cost grew by 140bps to 15.2% from 13.8% due to
annual rise in salaries. Biocon’s other expenses declined by 310bps to 12.4% from 15.5%
due to decline in R & D expenses. Its R & D expenses declined by 53%YoY to Rs230mn
from Rs490mn.
Moderate rise in net profit: Biocon’s net profit for the quarter grew by 15%YoY to
Rs1,050mn from Rs917mn due to improvement in EBIDTA margin, decline in interest
cost and lower tax rate. The company’s interest cost declined by 90%YoY to Rs3mn from
Rs29mn due to debt repayment. Its tax rate declined to 19.1% from 21.4%. Biocon’s all
hedging contracts for BMS expired in Q2FY14 and hence the hedging cost has come
down.
Recommendation and key risks: At the CMP of Rs451, Biocon trades at 22.6x FY14E
EPS of Rs20.0 and 17.2x FY15E EPS of Rs26.2 and 14.0x FY16E EPS of Rs32.2. We maintain
Buy rating on the scrip with a target price of Rs555 based on 18x Dec’15 EPS of Rs30.8
with an upside of 23% from CMP. Key risks to our assumptions are competition from
other global players in emerging markets. Moreover, the recent changes in the clinical
trial environment may lead to transferring some clinical trials to other countries
resulting in higher cost.
11 October 2013
‘We have a differentiated, niche product pipeline’ :.Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, CMD, Biocon: Business Line
Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, CMD, Biocon
CLICK links to Read MORE reports on:
Biocon,
Business Line
03 February 2013
Good growth across business verticals Biocon:: Centrum
Good growth across business verticals
Biocon’s results for Q3FY13 were better than our expectations. The company
reported 24%YoY growth in revenues, 90bps fall in EBIDTA margin and 8%YoY
growth in net profit. The sales growth was across all verticals. Notably among
them were, 22%YoY growth in biopharmaceuticals and 27%YoY growth in
contract research. Biocon’s Itolizumab has received DCGI permission and is likely
to be launched in India in FY14. The company’s recombinant human insulin has
successfully completed phase III trials in Europe. The company has entered into an
agreement with Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS) for its oral insulin IN-105. We have a
Buy rating for the scrip with a target price of Rs344 (based on 16x FY14E EPS).
Good sales growth: Biocon reported 24%YoY growth in revenues from Rs5.20bn
to Rs6.43bn. The biopharmaceutical business (64% of revenues) grew by 22%YoY
from Rs3.36bn to Rs4.09bn. Its branded formulation business (14% of revenues)
grew by 19%YoY from Rs720mn to Rs860mn. The contract research business (22%
of revenues) grew by 27%YoY from Rs1.1bn to Rs1.4bn.
Margins decline due to rise in material cost: Biocon’s margin for Q3FY13
declined by 90bps from 24.3% to 23.4% of total revenues due to the rise in material
cost. Its material cost increased by 200bps from 40.1% to 42.1% of net sales due to
the change in product mix. Personnel cost and other expenses declined by 50bps
each. The margin was also affected due to Rs310mn licensing development
income in Q3FY12.
17 November 2012
28 May 2012
22 May 2012
Biocon - Questioning accounting practices ::Espirito Santo
Please Share::
India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��
Biocon
Questioning accounting practices
BIOS’ shares have had an uninspiring run post the termination of the
PFE deal, which dealt a body blow to its biosimilar insulin aspirations.
Whilst the deal is now terminated, it will continue to throw its shadow
over future earnings, thanks to an aggressive accounting policy that
will see BIOS shift biosimilar insulin R&D costs off the P&L. This, along
with use of a creative transaction structure for AxiCorp, leaves us
frustrated with corporate governance standards at the company, and
we downgrade our accounting and corporate governance rating from
AMBER to RED. Stripping out biosimilar insulin (90% valuation
haircut) and Dificid, BIOS is currently trading at ~12x FY13E EPS. We
cut our FV by 47% to Rs. 186 (from Rs.350 earlier) and switch to SELL.
PFE deal termination was a body blow
Earlier in the year, BIOS’ biosimilar insulin aspirations were dealt a body blow
following the termination of its global development and commercialization deal with
PFE. This sent the shares down by ~10% on the day, with shares continuing to drift
post Q4’FY12 results earlier in the month. Post the deal’s termination, the focus now
shifts to BIOS’ internal progress on the biosimilar insulin program.
Another incidence of aggressive accounting policies
There has been considerable confusion over the timing and accounting treatment of
PFE milestones through the P&L, as BIOS currently has deferred revenues of
~Rs.4930m on the balance sheet. In our experience, globally, post a deal termination,
the balance of deferred revenues lying on the balance sheet is typically recognised in
year-1 as a one-off revenue item. This is in line with matching principle as the
revenues from a terminated deal should not ideally be matched against costs of
another deal (internal or external). Based on the guidance provided by the
management, we believe that the company is likely to recognize the deferred
revenue in line with R&D costs associated with biosimilar insulin program in a
particular year. We see this accounting policy as aggressive (the auditors have drawn
an emphasis in this regards). This marks the third instance of aggressive accounting
with regards to recognition of income/costs for biosimilar insulin. We believe it will
lead to consistent over-reporting of EPS (and potentially over-valuation) to the
tune of 20% every year during FY13-15 while also leaving investors blind-sided with
the clinical spend and progress in biosimilar insulin development.
Concerned with AxiCorp “circular” transaction
In April ’11, BIOS sold its 77% stake in AxiCorp to existing minority investors for a
~EUR40m valuation, ~33% higher that its acquisition cost of EUR30m, and implying a
P/E of ~7.4x. However, the nature and structure of the transaction raises eyebrows as
BIOS used a creative deal structure at the time of acquisition that allowed it to pay
~EUR16m cash for AxiCorp but required it to transfer the rights to biosimilar human
insulin and glargine for Germany to AxiCorp for EUR14m. Our analysis indicates that
BIOS received only ~EUR5m in cash for the divestment, which is surprising given that
AxiCorp had a net profit of ~EUR5m in FY11. Moreover, while it seems that BIOS made
a profit of ~EUR10m on the transaction, in reality, there was a cash loss of ~EUR10m
and a notional loss of ~EUR21m in buying back the IP rights. Despite this, the deal
structure ensured that BIOS was not required to report any loss on sale in the P&L.
Cash drain not reflected in EPS – Valuing BIOS on SOTP
With the PFE deal terminated, we see little reason to own BIOS shares in the wake of
only modest growth prospects for the base business. We expect the FCF generation
to be further pushed out by 2-3 years resulting in a haircut of ~90% on rNPV of insulin
deal from Rs.40 to
R&D costs and Dificid, BIOS is currently trading at ~12x FY13E earnings. We value
Biocon’s base business at Rs.172 or (v. Rs.265 earlier), as we reduce the target P/E
multiple to ~10x FY13E EPS (v. 15x earlier), a 30% discount to mid-cap Indian pharma
peers, which we see as justified given the modest growth prospects for the base
business, and persistent accounting and corporate governance issues. A combination
of lower base business valuation and substantial haircut on biosimilar insulin means
that our FV now stands reduced by 47% to Rs.186 (from Rs.350 earlier). We
downgrade to SELL, 14% downside. Our EBIT and EPS estimates stand reduced by
16%/28% and 10%/25% for FY13/14 respectively.
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��
Biocon
Questioning accounting practices
BIOS’ shares have had an uninspiring run post the termination of the
PFE deal, which dealt a body blow to its biosimilar insulin aspirations.
Whilst the deal is now terminated, it will continue to throw its shadow
over future earnings, thanks to an aggressive accounting policy that
will see BIOS shift biosimilar insulin R&D costs off the P&L. This, along
with use of a creative transaction structure for AxiCorp, leaves us
frustrated with corporate governance standards at the company, and
we downgrade our accounting and corporate governance rating from
AMBER to RED. Stripping out biosimilar insulin (90% valuation
haircut) and Dificid, BIOS is currently trading at ~12x FY13E EPS. We
cut our FV by 47% to Rs. 186 (from Rs.350 earlier) and switch to SELL.
PFE deal termination was a body blow
Earlier in the year, BIOS’ biosimilar insulin aspirations were dealt a body blow
following the termination of its global development and commercialization deal with
PFE. This sent the shares down by ~10% on the day, with shares continuing to drift
post Q4’FY12 results earlier in the month. Post the deal’s termination, the focus now
shifts to BIOS’ internal progress on the biosimilar insulin program.
Another incidence of aggressive accounting policies
There has been considerable confusion over the timing and accounting treatment of
PFE milestones through the P&L, as BIOS currently has deferred revenues of
~Rs.4930m on the balance sheet. In our experience, globally, post a deal termination,
the balance of deferred revenues lying on the balance sheet is typically recognised in
year-1 as a one-off revenue item. This is in line with matching principle as the
revenues from a terminated deal should not ideally be matched against costs of
another deal (internal or external). Based on the guidance provided by the
management, we believe that the company is likely to recognize the deferred
revenue in line with R&D costs associated with biosimilar insulin program in a
particular year. We see this accounting policy as aggressive (the auditors have drawn
an emphasis in this regards). This marks the third instance of aggressive accounting
with regards to recognition of income/costs for biosimilar insulin. We believe it will
lead to consistent over-reporting of EPS (and potentially over-valuation) to the
tune of 20% every year during FY13-15 while also leaving investors blind-sided with
the clinical spend and progress in biosimilar insulin development.
Concerned with AxiCorp “circular” transaction
In April ’11, BIOS sold its 77% stake in AxiCorp to existing minority investors for a
~EUR40m valuation, ~33% higher that its acquisition cost of EUR30m, and implying a
P/E of ~7.4x. However, the nature and structure of the transaction raises eyebrows as
BIOS used a creative deal structure at the time of acquisition that allowed it to pay
~EUR16m cash for AxiCorp but required it to transfer the rights to biosimilar human
insulin and glargine for Germany to AxiCorp for EUR14m. Our analysis indicates that
BIOS received only ~EUR5m in cash for the divestment, which is surprising given that
AxiCorp had a net profit of ~EUR5m in FY11. Moreover, while it seems that BIOS made
a profit of ~EUR10m on the transaction, in reality, there was a cash loss of ~EUR10m
and a notional loss of ~EUR21m in buying back the IP rights. Despite this, the deal
structure ensured that BIOS was not required to report any loss on sale in the P&L.
Cash drain not reflected in EPS – Valuing BIOS on SOTP
With the PFE deal terminated, we see little reason to own BIOS shares in the wake of
only modest growth prospects for the base business. We expect the FCF generation
to be further pushed out by 2-3 years resulting in a haircut of ~90% on rNPV of insulin
deal from Rs.40 to
R&D costs and Dificid, BIOS is currently trading at ~12x FY13E earnings. We value
Biocon’s base business at Rs.172 or (v. Rs.265 earlier), as we reduce the target P/E
multiple to ~10x FY13E EPS (v. 15x earlier), a 30% discount to mid-cap Indian pharma
peers, which we see as justified given the modest growth prospects for the base
business, and persistent accounting and corporate governance issues. A combination
of lower base business valuation and substantial haircut on biosimilar insulin means
that our FV now stands reduced by 47% to Rs.186 (from Rs.350 earlier). We
downgrade to SELL, 14% downside. Our EBIT and EPS estimates stand reduced by
16%/28% and 10%/25% for FY13/14 respectively.
CLICK links to Read MORE reports on:
Biocon,
Espirito Santo
30 April 2012
Biocon Limited Q4FY12 consolidated result :: GEPL capital
Please Share::
India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��
Biocon Limited Q4FY12 consolidated result
- Net sales showed a 14% Q-o-Q growth from Rs5,172 mn in Q3FY12 to Rs5,892 mn in Q4FY12. The sales of Q4FY11 included sales of Axicorp as well that Biocon divested, hence Y-o-Y is not comparable. Hence, we present a Q-o-Q comparison.
- 'EBITDA grew 20% Q-o-Q growth from Rs1,287 mn in Q3FY12 to Rs1,546 mn in Q4FY12. EBITDA margin too improved 50 bps from 24.8% in Q3FY12 to 25.3% in Q4FY12.
- Owing to Q-o-Q flattish interest cost and reduction in tax rate from 11.7% to 11%, PAT grew 15% to Rs978 mn in Q4FY12 from Rs848 mn in Q3FY12. PAT margin too showed a slight improvement from 16.4% to 16.6%.
- Overall the results look better than street expectations.
Y/E Mar Rs mn
|
Mar-11
|
Jun-11
|
Sep-11
|
Dec-11
|
Mar-12
|
Net sales
|
7,016
|
4,417
|
5,084
|
5,172
|
5,892
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
6.8
|
10.1
|
21.0
|
1.5
|
(16.0)
|
Q-o-Q (%)
|
37.7
|
(37.0)
|
15.1
|
1.7
|
13.9
|
Total expenditure
|
5,581
|
3,213
|
3,750
|
3,898
|
4,556
|
Raw Material Cost
|
3,932
|
1,891
|
2,142
|
2,085
|
2,396
|
% of sales
|
55.9
|
42.6
|
41.7
|
40.2
|
39.3
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
4.0
|
8.0
|
26.6
|
12.8
|
(39.0)
|
Q-o-Q (%)
|
112.7
|
(51.9)
|
13.3
|
(2.7)
|
14.9
|
Staff cost
|
820
|
693
|
778
|
792
|
813
|
% of sales
|
11.7
|
15.6
|
15.2
|
15.3
|
13.3
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
28.3
|
24.9
|
33.9
|
27.9
|
(0.8)
|
Q-o-Q (%)
|
32.4
|
(15.5)
|
12.4
|
1.7
|
2.7
|
Power Cost
|
218
|
231
|
227
|
243
|
0
|
% of sales
|
3.1
|
5.2
|
4.4
|
4.7
|
0.0
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
12.1
|
17.5
|
13.9
|
16.7
|
(100.0)
|
Q-o-Q (%)
|
4.7
|
6.0
|
(1.9)
|
7.3
|
(100.0)
|
Other expenses
|
611
|
398
|
603
|
778
|
1,346
|
% of sales
|
8.7
|
9.0
|
11.7
|
15.0
|
22.1
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
(6.0)
|
(2.8)
|
38.6
|
(2.2)
|
120.1
|
Q-o-Q (%)
|
(23.1)
|
(34.9)
|
51.3
|
29.1
|
73.0
|
EBIDTA
|
1,451
|
1,221
|
1,385
|
1,287
|
1,546
|
EBIDTAM (%)
|
20.6
|
27.5
|
27.0
|
24.8
|
25.3
|
Y-o-Y (bps)
|
62
|
(9)
|
(407)
|
(729)
|
470
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
10.1
|
9.8
|
5.8
|
(21.6)
|
6.6
|
Other Income
|
133
|
105
|
110
|
137
|
13
|
Depreciation
|
396
|
451
|
429
|
434
|
431
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
8.0
|
24.0
|
13.3
|
10.5
|
8.8
|
EBIT
|
1,188
|
876
|
1,065
|
990
|
1,129
|
Interest
|
57
|
57
|
20
|
29
|
30
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
70.5
|
(13.9)
|
(67.4)
|
(54.2)
|
(47.0)
|
PBT
|
1,131
|
820
|
1,045
|
961
|
1,099
|
Provision for Taxation
|
111
|
119
|
188
|
113
|
121
|
Tax rate (%)
|
9.8
|
14.6
|
18.0
|
11.7
|
11.0
|
Profit after tax
|
1,008
|
701
|
857
|
848
|
978
|
NPM (%)
|
14.4
|
15.9
|
16.9
|
16.4
|
16.6
|
Y-o-Y (%)
|
25.0
|
(8.7)
|
(3.9)
|
(15.8)
|
(3.0)
|
Q-o-Q (%)
|
0.0
|
(30.5)
|
22.3
|
(1.0)
|
15.3
|
Share capital
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
1,000
|
EPS (`)
|
5.04
|
3.50
|
4.28
|
4.24
|
4.89
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)