Please Share:: 
India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��
Edelweiss style analysis portfolio‐ ESA
Under prevailing market conditions, ESA factor model indicates 1 year returns, ROE and DPS
growth are three street favorite factors for stock picking in April 2012.
We recommend equal weighted value neutral portfolio.
Top 10 Long-Portfolio stocks
NSE Symbol
TITAN
HINDUNILVR
HCLTECH
INFY
BAJAJ-AUTO
HEROMOTOCO
DRREDDY
ULTRACEMCO
M&M
AMBUJACEM
Bottom 10 Short-Portfolio stocks
NSE Symbol
ONGC
NTPC
TATAPOWER
RELINFRA
DLF
JPASSOCIAT
MCDOWELL-N
ADANIENT
SAIL
UNITECH
Introduction
Factor model
Over the past few years, Indian capital markets have taken giant strides to enter the league
of global profitable investment avenues. This growth has attracted investors with diverse
investment strategies in quest for better returns. Along with this bustling growth, investment
strategies too are undergoing a paradigm shift. The conventional long only strategies are
gradually being sidelined by quantitative models with emphasis on long-short portfolios. Such
a drift is justified on the back of volatile nature of equity markets globally.
The Edelweiss Style Analysis (ESA) gives you cutting-edge research and an in-depth analysis
on ‘what’s hot’ in the current scenario. The analysis revolves round various factors driving the
market in different scenarios and tries to capture factors driving the current momentum. We
believe that markets follow a typical investment style or pattern at different intervals, which
is mirrored by certain factors. The analysis provides investors with an understanding of the
factors that are currently working in prevailing market conditions to enhance portfolio
performance. The analysis outlines a host of long–short portfolios drawn on the basis of these
factors.
The efficacy of the Factor Model is gauged by the performance of portfolios from various
dimensions:
Long Portfolio
Short Portfolio
Long–Short Portfolio
Long–Short Nifty
Nifty
Style analysis
Style analysis is basically a framework for measuring the efficacy of a select set of
fundamental and technical factors blended with certain quantitative disciplines. It tries to
encapsulate traditional investment styles of value and growth buying. Style analysis aims to
capture the factor momentum under prevailing market conditions to maximize the magnitude
and stability of expected incremental performance. However, due to changing market
dynamics, factors are bound to change from time to time. A specific factor riding the
momentum may change over a period of time.
Various factors
Style analysis makes use of a host of factors that aid momentum in a specific stock. P/E, EPS,
revenue, book value, EBITDA, enterprise value, P/BV, ROE, are few factors used for this
analysis. The above given factors often serve as an efficient evaluation tool. For simplicity
and better understanding, the factors are placed into different baskets as follows:
Momentum Factors
Growth Factors
Value Factors
Quality Factors
Why Multi Factor Model
Edelweiss multi factor model aims to diagnose right factor momentum to outperform the
benchmark by earning the alpha gains. Active investors like hedge funds, institutions, and
portfolio managers have been known to effectively profit from similar strategies. Considering
the volatility in equity markets, such an alternative investment can be effective in diversifying
the allocations and maximizing returns. Investment styles may be long portfolio, long
portfolio–short Nifty, or long–short portfolio.
Market in a bull run may augur well for a long portfolio style of investment, while in an
unstable market a long portfolio and short Nifty would be the preferred investment strategy.
In case of an uncertain market with negative bias, the long–short portfolio style of
investment is preferable. These strategies seem to be generating good returns on a
consistent basis and thus can be a preferred one during volatility where negative cues clearly
seem to outplay positive ones.
Edelweiss Style Analysis (ESA)
Introduction
Under dynamic market conditions, generation of Alpha returns is often the greatest challenge
confronting fund managers, which has underscored the increased importance of quantitative
stock picking. At the same time, for an active portfolio manager, a detailed understanding
of factor styles under changing market regimes is becoming increasingly important. Through
this research, we analyze the efficacy of fundamental and technical factors for stock selection
to complement the skill set of a portfolio manager.
Model description
The ability to predict the relative performance of various styles and successfully
implementing a strategy based on these predictions should have a positive effect on overall
investment returns. Indeed, as we have seen in our monitoring of investment performance
based on these styles over the years, being in appropriate groups (e.g., value, growth, and
market cap) can make an enormous difference to investment success. This study examines
the efficacy of over 20 superior factors and back-test the each factor portfolio returns since
January 2003.
Single factor portfolio construction methodology: To construct long-short factor portfolios,
we rank stocks within the coverage universe by each factor every month, and group them
into five quintiles (quintile 1 contains the highest ranked stocks). For each factor, we then
calculate the one month subsequent performance of these five equally weighted quintile
portfolios, and compute the performance difference between the highest and lowest quintiles
(Q1–Q5), to arrive at a factor return.
Factor groups: Over 20 factors derived from fundamental and technical data base were
grouped into four categories—growth, momentum, value, and quality factors. (Explained in
detail later).
Back‐test results for each static factor portfolio: We report the cumulative return of
portfolios based on single factor since January 2003.
Various Factor Groups
Momentum factor
Momentum investing has taken the Indian stock market by a storm over the past couple of
years. The essence of this stock strategy is to buy winners and sell losers. Within the
momentum factor, it is worth noting that the duration of past performance (12-month/6-
months/3months) will influence the type of strategy that should be employed.
Longer look back and optimal holding period produce more reliable returns that are
sustainable over the long term. In this study, a 12-month and 6-month look back and a onemonth
holding period appear to be optimal. This is consistent with our intuition that investors
under react to information over the medium term (3 months), thus justifying the 12-month
looks back as optimal. Momentum factors have shown greater dependence on market regime
change on time to time basis.
The graph below shows cumulative returns of single factor portfolio with the base of 100 in
January 2003.
Growth factor
Growth style typically focuses on a company’s historical earnings growth to identify stocks
with the prospect of growing earnings at above-average rates versus the market. Managers
seek to invest in stocks of companies whose future earnings power has been underestimated
by markets. Growth is generally associated with greater upside potential, albeit with greater
risk on the downside.
From the growth factor chart below it is evident that none of the growth factors have given
incremental returns considering the fact that much of the weight has been given to price
momentum-driven factors all throughout the bull market period.
Since June 2007, BVPS* growth has shown positive momentum, at the same time, EBITDA
growth has remained volatile, where as sales growth has continuously given negative returns
all throughout the sample period.
Value factor
The value factor style of investing has exhibited cyclical behavior over time, but predicting
inflection points in these cycles has been a challenge for investors.
Value factors typically focus on existing assets and valuation measures that equate a stock’s
price to the company’s intrinsic value. The premise for value managers is that the market has
incorrectly priced a stock in relation to the firm’s current assets and earnings and the
company will be revalued over time, thereby to generate value for investors. Value is
traditionally associated with more moderate upside and greater downside protection over
market cycles than growth.
Looking at the value factor chart, market cap to sales and price to cash flow are two leading
factors which have performed consistently whereas price to earnings is favored in recent
market turmoil, on the other side EV/EBITDA is the worst performer in the value factor pack
all throughout the sample period.
The value factor pack has shown varied patterns under changing market conditions. Till mid-
2005 a couple of value factors were effective and had given incremental returns, but in the
later bull market, they have lost momentum and got penalized..
Quality factor
Besides the above conventional style factors, there are a couple of quality factors which have
shown a linear relationship with stock movement under different market conditions.
From the quality factor chart below it is evident that market cap (size) factor performance
during a market downturn was considerably higher than in other periods, indicating that at
every fall, large cap stocks are favored against small caps.
12-month price momentum/Beta is highly correlated to 12-month price momentum factor,
indicating that stocks with high return high Beta share the same characteristics as price
momentum factor in a bull market.
As witnessed globally during a bull market run, RoE does not play a significant role in
explaining the returns. Market players have ignored RoE throughout the Bull Run and as a
result it has remained flat with upward bias every time the market falls.
Conclusion
In isolation, none of the factors outperform the broader index on consistent basis. Single
factor effectiveness can vary over time, depending on the prevailing market regime and no
single factor works consistently for every market condition. Fund managers can mitigate
challenges of timing style & sub-style cycles by engaging in active style management.
Discerning inflection points of style & sub-style cycles is difficult. Employing a more robust
mechanism to capture the prevailing style may help capture more returns.
Assessment of various styles & sub-style is necessary to better understand the implications of
equity allocations regardless of cycles, while increasing diversification.
Various permutations of styles can be explored to optimize the diversification and return
objectives of fund managers. Given the unpredictable nature and recent magnitude of style
cycles, fund managers may be better served by choosing multiple investments within a substyle
category where characteristics and behavior together are complementary.
India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��
Edelweiss style analysis portfolio‐ ESA
Under prevailing market conditions, ESA factor model indicates 1 year returns, ROE and DPS
growth are three street favorite factors for stock picking in April 2012.
We recommend equal weighted value neutral portfolio.
Top 10 Long-Portfolio stocks
NSE Symbol
TITAN
HINDUNILVR
HCLTECH
INFY
BAJAJ-AUTO
HEROMOTOCO
DRREDDY
ULTRACEMCO
M&M
AMBUJACEM
Bottom 10 Short-Portfolio stocks
NSE Symbol
ONGC
NTPC
TATAPOWER
RELINFRA
DLF
JPASSOCIAT
MCDOWELL-N
ADANIENT
SAIL
UNITECH
Introduction
Factor model
Over the past few years, Indian capital markets have taken giant strides to enter the league
of global profitable investment avenues. This growth has attracted investors with diverse
investment strategies in quest for better returns. Along with this bustling growth, investment
strategies too are undergoing a paradigm shift. The conventional long only strategies are
gradually being sidelined by quantitative models with emphasis on long-short portfolios. Such
a drift is justified on the back of volatile nature of equity markets globally.
The Edelweiss Style Analysis (ESA) gives you cutting-edge research and an in-depth analysis
on ‘what’s hot’ in the current scenario. The analysis revolves round various factors driving the
market in different scenarios and tries to capture factors driving the current momentum. We
believe that markets follow a typical investment style or pattern at different intervals, which
is mirrored by certain factors. The analysis provides investors with an understanding of the
factors that are currently working in prevailing market conditions to enhance portfolio
performance. The analysis outlines a host of long–short portfolios drawn on the basis of these
factors.
The efficacy of the Factor Model is gauged by the performance of portfolios from various
dimensions:
Long Portfolio
Short Portfolio
Long–Short Portfolio
Long–Short Nifty
Nifty
Style analysis
Style analysis is basically a framework for measuring the efficacy of a select set of
fundamental and technical factors blended with certain quantitative disciplines. It tries to
encapsulate traditional investment styles of value and growth buying. Style analysis aims to
capture the factor momentum under prevailing market conditions to maximize the magnitude
and stability of expected incremental performance. However, due to changing market
dynamics, factors are bound to change from time to time. A specific factor riding the
momentum may change over a period of time.
Various factors
Style analysis makes use of a host of factors that aid momentum in a specific stock. P/E, EPS,
revenue, book value, EBITDA, enterprise value, P/BV, ROE, are few factors used for this
analysis. The above given factors often serve as an efficient evaluation tool. For simplicity
and better understanding, the factors are placed into different baskets as follows:
Momentum Factors
Growth Factors
Value Factors
Quality Factors
Why Multi Factor Model
Edelweiss multi factor model aims to diagnose right factor momentum to outperform the
benchmark by earning the alpha gains. Active investors like hedge funds, institutions, and
portfolio managers have been known to effectively profit from similar strategies. Considering
the volatility in equity markets, such an alternative investment can be effective in diversifying
the allocations and maximizing returns. Investment styles may be long portfolio, long
portfolio–short Nifty, or long–short portfolio.
Market in a bull run may augur well for a long portfolio style of investment, while in an
unstable market a long portfolio and short Nifty would be the preferred investment strategy.
In case of an uncertain market with negative bias, the long–short portfolio style of
investment is preferable. These strategies seem to be generating good returns on a
consistent basis and thus can be a preferred one during volatility where negative cues clearly
seem to outplay positive ones.
Edelweiss Style Analysis (ESA)
Introduction
Under dynamic market conditions, generation of Alpha returns is often the greatest challenge
confronting fund managers, which has underscored the increased importance of quantitative
stock picking. At the same time, for an active portfolio manager, a detailed understanding
of factor styles under changing market regimes is becoming increasingly important. Through
this research, we analyze the efficacy of fundamental and technical factors for stock selection
to complement the skill set of a portfolio manager.
Model description
The ability to predict the relative performance of various styles and successfully
implementing a strategy based on these predictions should have a positive effect on overall
investment returns. Indeed, as we have seen in our monitoring of investment performance
based on these styles over the years, being in appropriate groups (e.g., value, growth, and
market cap) can make an enormous difference to investment success. This study examines
the efficacy of over 20 superior factors and back-test the each factor portfolio returns since
January 2003.
Single factor portfolio construction methodology: To construct long-short factor portfolios,
we rank stocks within the coverage universe by each factor every month, and group them
into five quintiles (quintile 1 contains the highest ranked stocks). For each factor, we then
calculate the one month subsequent performance of these five equally weighted quintile
portfolios, and compute the performance difference between the highest and lowest quintiles
(Q1–Q5), to arrive at a factor return.
Factor groups: Over 20 factors derived from fundamental and technical data base were
grouped into four categories—growth, momentum, value, and quality factors. (Explained in
detail later).
Back‐test results for each static factor portfolio: We report the cumulative return of
portfolios based on single factor since January 2003.
Various Factor Groups
Momentum factor
Momentum investing has taken the Indian stock market by a storm over the past couple of
years. The essence of this stock strategy is to buy winners and sell losers. Within the
momentum factor, it is worth noting that the duration of past performance (12-month/6-
months/3months) will influence the type of strategy that should be employed.
Longer look back and optimal holding period produce more reliable returns that are
sustainable over the long term. In this study, a 12-month and 6-month look back and a onemonth
holding period appear to be optimal. This is consistent with our intuition that investors
under react to information over the medium term (3 months), thus justifying the 12-month
looks back as optimal. Momentum factors have shown greater dependence on market regime
change on time to time basis.
The graph below shows cumulative returns of single factor portfolio with the base of 100 in
January 2003.
Growth factor
Growth style typically focuses on a company’s historical earnings growth to identify stocks
with the prospect of growing earnings at above-average rates versus the market. Managers
seek to invest in stocks of companies whose future earnings power has been underestimated
by markets. Growth is generally associated with greater upside potential, albeit with greater
risk on the downside.
From the growth factor chart below it is evident that none of the growth factors have given
incremental returns considering the fact that much of the weight has been given to price
momentum-driven factors all throughout the bull market period.
Since June 2007, BVPS* growth has shown positive momentum, at the same time, EBITDA
growth has remained volatile, where as sales growth has continuously given negative returns
all throughout the sample period.
Value factor
The value factor style of investing has exhibited cyclical behavior over time, but predicting
inflection points in these cycles has been a challenge for investors.
Value factors typically focus on existing assets and valuation measures that equate a stock’s
price to the company’s intrinsic value. The premise for value managers is that the market has
incorrectly priced a stock in relation to the firm’s current assets and earnings and the
company will be revalued over time, thereby to generate value for investors. Value is
traditionally associated with more moderate upside and greater downside protection over
market cycles than growth.
Looking at the value factor chart, market cap to sales and price to cash flow are two leading
factors which have performed consistently whereas price to earnings is favored in recent
market turmoil, on the other side EV/EBITDA is the worst performer in the value factor pack
all throughout the sample period.
The value factor pack has shown varied patterns under changing market conditions. Till mid-
2005 a couple of value factors were effective and had given incremental returns, but in the
later bull market, they have lost momentum and got penalized..
Quality factor
Besides the above conventional style factors, there are a couple of quality factors which have
shown a linear relationship with stock movement under different market conditions.
From the quality factor chart below it is evident that market cap (size) factor performance
during a market downturn was considerably higher than in other periods, indicating that at
every fall, large cap stocks are favored against small caps.
12-month price momentum/Beta is highly correlated to 12-month price momentum factor,
indicating that stocks with high return high Beta share the same characteristics as price
momentum factor in a bull market.
As witnessed globally during a bull market run, RoE does not play a significant role in
explaining the returns. Market players have ignored RoE throughout the Bull Run and as a
result it has remained flat with upward bias every time the market falls.
Conclusion
In isolation, none of the factors outperform the broader index on consistent basis. Single
factor effectiveness can vary over time, depending on the prevailing market regime and no
single factor works consistently for every market condition. Fund managers can mitigate
challenges of timing style & sub-style cycles by engaging in active style management.
Discerning inflection points of style & sub-style cycles is difficult. Employing a more robust
mechanism to capture the prevailing style may help capture more returns.
Assessment of various styles & sub-style is necessary to better understand the implications of
equity allocations regardless of cycles, while increasing diversification.
Various permutations of styles can be explored to optimize the diversification and return
objectives of fund managers. Given the unpredictable nature and recent magnitude of style
cycles, fund managers may be better served by choosing multiple investments within a substyle
category where characteristics and behavior together are complementary.
No comments:
Post a Comment