Pages

07 February 2011

RBS: Hold Tech Mahindra --Running a tight ship; Rs650 target

Please Share:: Bookmark and Share India Equity Research Reports, IPO and Stock News
Visit http://indiaer.blogspot.com/ for complete details �� ��


Tech Mahindra
Running a tight ship
We believe Tech Mahindra's high revenue concentration from few clients, its
focus on the telecom vertical and the difficulties in turning around Satyam will
lead to lower revenue and EBITDA growth than peers. Hence, a major positive rerating
is unlikely. We initiate coverage with a Hold rating
Business risk still high
Continuing pressure on volumes and pricing at TECHM’s top client (British Telecom (BT)
which accounts for about 44% of TECHM’s revenues) and high dependence on its top 2-5
clients (cumulatively contribute 28% of TECHM’s revenues) indicate TECHM’s weakening
revenue growth visibility. Our analysis indicates revenue and earnings growth for most of its
top-five clients (72% of revenues) and telecom operators in the US/Europe are likely to be
muted. We believe revenue growth, excluding the top-five clients and US/Europe, will require
higher investments, which will likely affect margins.
Margin challenges also increasing
Besides challenges relating to revenue growth, we expect TECHM’s margins to remain
muted due to: 1) a high attrition rate (30% annualised for IT Services), limiting any major
upside in its utilisation rate; 2) pricing unlikely to be a tailwind, given high client concentration
and macro challenges among some of the top-five clients; 3) likely accelerated growth
outside the US/Europe and top-five clients, where margins are likely to be lower due to
required additional investment and high proportion of low-margin system integration work.
We initiate with a Hold rating
We initiate with a Hold recommendation and sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) based target price of
Rs650, comprising: 1) Rs466 for TECHM (excluding Satyam) based on target PE of c11x
FY13F diluted adjusted EPS (excluding Satyam); and 2) Rs184 per TECHM share, through
Satyam, based on a target EV/EBITDA of 5.8x FY13F for Satyam’s recurring EBITDA
(EV/EBITDA is a better multiple for valuing Satyam, given the high volatility on items below
EBITDA). At our target price, TECHM is valued at 11x FY13F diluted adjusted EPS (including
Satyam), a c50% discount to the Indian IT industry benchmark Infosys.

The basics
Catalysts for share price performance
We expect key near-term catalysts to be:
􀀟 CY11F IT budget finalisation (which we expect to be positive) and the renewal of large
outsourcing deals (over the next eight quarters, starting 4QCY10). We believe TECHM will
struggle to achieve industry-average growth in FY12, due to low growth opportunities from its
top-five clients and single vertical (telecom) focus.
􀀟 Cognizant’s guidance for CY11 (in February 2011) and Infosys’s guidance for FY12 in April
2011. While building in its typical conservatism, we expect Infosys to take a more confident
stance on FY12 guidance. However, considering various micro risks specific to TECHM, we
expect it to face many revenue growth challenges.
􀀟 The likely underperformance of the telecom vertical (which contributes 100% of TECHM’s
revenues) vs other verticals due to low earnings growth of clients within telecom vertical.
􀀟 Likely negative surprises in TECHM’s margin performance.
Earnings momentum
􀀟 We believe that due to its high client concentration and focus only on the telecom vertical,
TECHM will underperform its peers in revenue and EBITDA terms.
􀀟 We expect TECHM’s EPS growth to be lower than its peers’ considering organic business
risks, relatively high headwinds on margins and the difficult task of turning around Satyam.
􀀟 Our forecast assumes USD revenue, INR EBITDA and INR EPS FY11-FY13 CAGR of 12%,
6% and 8%, respectively. Excluding amortisation of deferred revenues, we expect INRadjusted
EBITDA and INR-adjusted EPS FY11-FY13 CAGR of 7% and 10%.
Valuation and target price
We initiate with a Hold rating and Rs650 SOTP-based target price, which comprises: 1) Rs466 for
TECHM (excluding Satyam), based on a target FY13F P/E of 11x on diluted adjusted EPS
(excluding Satyam); and 2) Rs184 per TECHM share through Satyam, based on a target
EV/EBITDA of 5.8x FY13F, Satyam’s recurring EBITDA. At our target price, TECHM is valued at
11x FY13F diluted adjusted EPS (including Satyam), a c50% discount to the Indian IT industry
benchmark Infosys.
How we differ from consensus
Bloomberg estimates may not be comparable with our estimates, considering the ambiguity
relating to the inclusion of profits from associates, including Satyam. Our normalised EPS
estimates consider recurring profits from associates, including Satyam (accounting for 20-25% of
normalised EPS). Also, the treatment of amortisation of revenue receipts from the top client in
consensus estimates is not clear, in our view. Our adjusted EPS excludes this amortisation.
Risks to central scenario
􀀟 Higher-than-expected revenue growth among its top-five clients and any major volume ramp
up in the telecom vertical for Indian IT services.
􀀟 The potential merger of Tech Mahindra and Satyam - risk related to the merger ratio and the
resulting impact on stock price.
􀀟 Higher-than-expected economic revival in Western economies will likely benefit TECHM and
other vendors. However, any acceleration in Europe’s economic recovery will benefit TECHM
more than its peers considering higher revenue contribution of >50% from Europe for TECHM.
􀀟 Currency volatility, specially any sharp depreciation of the INR vs the GBP and the EUR, will
benefit TECHM more than its peers considering its higher invoicing in GBP and EUR.

Business risk still high
We believe the business risk to TECHM (excluding Satyam) remains high, with low growth
opportunities in telecom (100% of revenues) and the top-five clients accounting for about
72% of revenues). Hence, we expect its revenue growth to remain muted going forward.
Continuing pressure on volumes and pricing at TECHM’s top client BT (contributing about 44% to
TECHM’s revenues in 3Q11 and business risk through high client concentration beyond BT,
indicate TECHM’s weakening revenue growth visibility. Our analysis indicates that revenue and
earnings growth for most of TECHM’s top-five clients (72% of revenues) and telecom operators in
the US/Europe are likely to be muted in the medium term. We expect revenue growth, excluding
top-five clients and US/Europe, will require greater investment, which will likely affect margins.
Growth challenges to continue from BT
Revenues from core BT spend to remain under pressure
Over the years TECHM has partnered BT across business segments, including Retail, Wholesale,
Open Reach and BT Global Services (BTGS). The first three segments are treated as core BT
work segments and BTGS is an enterprise services arm for BT’s enterprise clients.
Given the recessionary pressure and progress in 21CN layout (an internet protocol-based network
fit for the 21st century) already behind in a big way, core BT spend reduced materially after FY08,
impacting most of BT’s outsourcing vendors, including TECHM. Therefore, growth opportunities
within core BT for TECHM are likely to be limited. Hence, we believe with TECHM’s highest wallet
share coming through increased penetration of core BT spend and likely reduced capex
requirements in the coming years (relating to core work), this part of the BT business for TECHM
is likely to remain under pressure.
Revenue ramp up from Barcelona deal lagging
With growth opportunities tapering in core BT since late 2006, TECHM started pursuing
outsourcing spend in BTGS (BTGS’s annualised 2QFY11 revenues were about £8bn), providing
IT and hardware services to BT’s enterprise customers. In early 2007, TECHM won the largest
outsourcing contract by any Indian vendor from BT, called Barcelona, worth about £500m and
spread over five years. In return, TECHM paid BT Rs5.25bn as upfront savings resulting from
outsourcing this contract to TECHM. With scope and pricing restructuring of Barcelona in
3QFY10, the revenue run rate from this contract is unlikely to increase. Therefore, for TECHM, the
revenue growth opportunity of this deal will likely be muted going forward.

Revenue from Andes deal largely discretionary in nature
In 2QFY09A, TECHM was awarded another contract worth £350m, called Andes. TECHM paid
Rs4.40bn to BT in 4QFY08 for exclusivity of deal discussion and savings as a result of BT
outsourcing this deal to TECHM. As the Andes deal is transformational in nature, it is likely to be
discretionary with revenues expected to decline post the ramp-up phase. 1QFY10 was the first full
quarter of ramping up of this deal for TECHM. We believe that the deal’s ramp-up is mostly
complete.

Most deals with BT group are being restructured
With recessionary pressure on BT significantly impacting its earnings, the company has started
restructuring its contract with TECHM in terms of scope and pricing effective 3QFY10. With
significant changes in scope and pricing of many BT deals (including Strada, Barcelona and
Andes), TECHM has received £126m from BT as restructuring fees. Management claims these
fees are unrelated to the upfront payment to BT when TECHM won the Barcelona and Andes
deals (together constituting the same amount as restructuring fees received by TECHM from BT).
TECHM is amortising these restructuring fees over 19-20 quarters, effective from 1QFY10.
The company treated upfront payments made to BT as one-time expenses in the FY07 and FY08
audited financial statements. However it is amortising the receipt of restructuring fees over 19-20
quarters (starting 1QFY10). Hence, to reflect a more correct picture in terms of cash flows as well
as recurring earnings, we exclude the amortisation of restructuring fees (post tax) over 19-20
quarters, effective 1QFY10, from our normalised EPS estimates while arriving at our fair value for
TECHM.

Other top clients – growth acceleration difficult with high penetration
Besides top client BT, TECHM has established long-term relationships with AT&T, Telefonica O2,
Alcatel and Motorola – its other top clients. The company has been successful in mining these
relationships and has master service agreements with them, providing long-term revenue visibility.
This has led to the risk of high client-concentration shifting from the top client (still high at 44% in
3QFY11 vs 80% in FY05) to the top 2-5 clients (28% in 3QFY11 and 7% in FY05) – with the top
five clients accounting for 72% of revenue in 3QFY11. Based on 3QFY11 financials, the average
annualised revenue run rate from the top 2-5 clients has now increased to about US$75m per
client, from US$4m per client in FY05A. The revenue run rate for the second top client, according
to us, has risen to >US$125m at present, indicating that the current revenue run rate from the top
3-5 clients is at >US$45m per client
Macro concerns behind, but telecom to underperform
Considering 1) strong correlations (as shown in Charts 1 and 2 within our sector arguments) in
revenue growth of Indian IT companies with operating profits of S&P500 companies; and 2) our
findings relating to likely higher growth in BFSI/Retail/Manufacturing for Indian IT as discussed
earlier in our sector argument, we have done a second level check for lead growth indicators
within some of the major verticals of Indian IT. We have extended the growth analysis to compare
the revenue/earnings growth of top global companies by industry (source: Bloomberg) to get
some lead indicators regarding growth opportunities for Indian IT in some of the major verticals.
Our analysis of the telecom service provider (TSP) vertical indicates that revenue and EBITDA
growth of the top global TSPs in CY07/CY08 was higher than in other verticals. However, revenue
and EBITDA growth are likely to be modest through CY10-12 (a post-recessionary period), but we
see much higher growth in other verticals including BFSI, Retail and Manufacturing (analysis
restricted to the auto sector). Telecom, being a defensive vertical, is unlikely to provide any major
positive or negative surprise relative to other sectors during booms and recessions. Therefore, we
believe each telecom IT services vendor’s growth is largely dependent on its clients relationship
and maturity and the extent of outsourcing/offshoring within its clients. Considering the high client
concentration of TECHM with most top five clients, muted growth prospects in Top client BT, and
high competitive pressure within top 2-5 clients, growth opportunities are likely to remain muted
for TECHM in FY11F-FY13F

Growth within TECHM’s top 2-5 clients may come through higher offshoring (not yet visible
despite the relationships being four to five years old) and an increase in demand for application
modification post the converged network layout and managed services. However, while
addressing growth outside BT, we believe competitive pressures are likely to be intense.
Therefore, TECHM’s overall growth within its top five clients (which still contribute c72% of
revenues) is likely to be muted beyond FY10. Therefore, we believe TECHM has to invest in
growing its non-top five clients, whose revenue contribution is just 28%. (Its top 6-10 clients
contribute c9% of revenues).
However, a revival in telecom capex cycle from CY11 onwards could deliver positive surprises for
IT services vendors in that vertical as telecom clients’ operating expenditure would start to
increase, albeit with lag to capex growth. We believe that in this scenario, TECHM would benefit
given its strong footprint. However, we believe any such benefit would be limited outside its top
client (BT, still c44% of revenues) considering its major capex growth cycle has past. Following
any major revival in telecom capex (outside the top client), we would expect TECHM to face
significant competition from the other large Indian vendors (whose revenue in the telecom vertical
is also high).
TECHM needs to invest in markets (ex-US/Europe) and in new services
TECHM’s revenues outside the US and Europe are cUS$150m (based on 3QFY11A annualised
revenue run rate) vs its peers’ (TCS, Infosys and Wipro) at US$700m-1,500m. TECHM’s
penetration in telecom markets outside the US and Europe may not be lower than its peers, but
competition in any such markets is likely to be intense given the likely higher growth in telecom
vertical in these markets (versus US/Europe) for the Indian IT industry. Typically, margins in
emerging markets are lower.
Besides the above, TECHM is a late entrant in BPO and IMS segments. We do not doubt
TECHM’s prowess in client mining through BPO/ITO/managed services, but the competition has
already scaled up its offerings in BPO/ITO/managed services for telecom clients. Within managed
services, clients are aggressively demanding upfront cost savings, including taking over
employees and assets, especially in telecom. Indian vendors, including TECHM, have been
reluctant to take over employees and assets till now. Therefore, we expect TECHM will have to
invest more in these offerings to increase its penetration.

Margin challenges also increasing
Besides the big challenges to revenue growth discussed earlier, TECHM’s margin visibility
is lower than its peers’ given its supply side issues, lower pricing power and higher
investment in sales and marketing.
Besides challenges relating to revenue growth, we expect TECHM’s margin to remain muted due
to: 1) a high attrition rate (30% annualised for IT Services), limiting any major upside in its
utilisation rate; 2) pricing unlikely to be a tailwind, given high client concentration and macro
challenges among some of the top-five clients; 3) likely accelerated growth outside the US/Europe
and top-five clients, where margins are likely to be lower due to required additional investment
and high proportion of low-margin system integration work.

Initiate with Hold rating
We initiate on TECHM with a Hold rating given its high business risks and the likely
underperformance in EBITDA and EPS growth (both ex-Satyam) vs peers, as well as the
difficult task of turning around Satyam. Hence, we believe a positive re-rating is unlikely.
Our target price for TECHM is based on an SOTP valuation. We value TECHM (ex-Satyam) on a
P/E discount to our target multiple for Infosys. We value Satyam based on an EV/EBITDA
discount to Infosys. We believe that EV/EBITDA is better method to value Satyam considering the
volatility of items below the EBITDA line, including various pending litigations and their impact on
cash flow, other income, tax provisions and hence on EPS.
While arriving at our target price for TECHM, we are excluding the amortisation of revenue
receipts from our EBITDA and normalised EPS calculation as discussed earlier. In the following
table we show our adjusted EBITDA and adjusted normalised EPS calculations.

We initiate with a Hold rating
We initiate with a Hold rating and Rs650 target price based on our SOTP: 1) Rs466 for TECHM
(excluding Satyam) based on a target PE of c11x FY13F diluted adjusted EPS (excluding
Satyam);and 2) Rs184 per TECHM share through Satyam based on a target EV/EBITDA of 5.8x
FY13F Satyam’s recurring EBITDA (EV/EBITDA is a better multiple for valuing Satyam given high
volatility on items below EBITDA). At our target price, TECHM is valued at 11x FY13F diluted
adjusted EPS (including Satyam), a c50% discount to the Indian IT industry benchmark Infosys.

Our target PE multiple for valuing TECHM (excluding Satyam and based on EPS excluding
amortisation of one time revenue receipt as discussed earlier) is at c50% discount to our fair
multiple for Infosys which we believe is fair considering much higher business risk, much lower
EBITDA margins and significantly lower cash flow generation. Our target EV/EBITDA multiple for
valuing Satyam is at a c60% discount to our fair valuation for Infosys, which we believe is
reasonable considering much lower revenue growth visibility, higher business risk, much lower
EBITDA margins and significantly lower cash flow generation.
Management indicated TECHM-Satyam merger will be prioritised
We believe post re-statement of Satyam’s accounts and largely cleaned-up balance sheet,
Mahindra & Mahindra’s management will consider merging Tech Mahindra (TECHM) and Satyam.
As per the management, such an announcement is likely in the short-medium term. Our estimates
(at the current market price of TECHM and Satyam) value Mahindra group’s stake in TECHM
(excluding TECHM’s stake in Satyam) at >US$520m and in Satyam at >US$300m. Further, we
believe that the brand identity will also be taken into account while merging the two. However with
lot of challenges relating to Satyam’s steady state of financials as discussed above we believe
that ambiguity relating to merger ratio would remain high.

Management team
Mahindra and Mahindra Group (M&M Group) of India together with UK’s British Telecom Group
(BT Group) are the promoter owners of the Tech Mahindra (TECHM) with their combined equity
stake of 72.8%. M&M Group owns 48.2%, while BT Group owns 24.5% and the balance stake of
around 0.1% is held by the Mahindra BT Investment Company Mauritius. Besides BT Group’s
equity stake in TECHM, BT is the largest client of TECHM with revenue concentration of c44%
(while others including top 2-4 clients contribute 28% of the revenues). TECHM’s day-to-day
operations are run by a team of professionals under the leadership of Mr Vineet Nayyar, who is
the Vice Chairman, Managing Director and CEO of TECHM. To diversify beyond the telecom
vertical (which contributes almost 100% of TECHM’s revenues), TECHM group acquired a 42.7%
equity stake in Satyam Computers in July 2009 which resulted into a significant decline in the net
cash balances of TECHM as well as dividend payments.



No comments:

Post a Comment